The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Decline in Percentage N of C3 and C4 Crops with Increasing Plant Mass
Abstract
A data base was constructed of the % N and plant d. wts (W) in t ha−1 of C3 and C4 crops that had been grown with sufficient nitrogen to permit maximum growth rate. The % N of all crops declined sharply with increase in W but this decline differed between C3 and C4 crops. When W was greater than I t ha−1, 86% of the variance in In % N was removed by the model % N = aW−b with b = −0·5 for all crops, and a = 5·7% for C3 crops and 4·1 % for C4 crops. The same model gave a good description of data on C3 and C4 crops entirely independent of that used for developing the model. According to this relationship the fractional decline in % N with increase in plant mass was the same for both types of crops, but C4 crops contained about 72% of the nitrogen in C3 crops at equivalent d. wts. As approx. 32% more dry matter was produced per unit of intercepted radiation for C4 and C3 crops, the N uptake (or weight of plant protein produced) per unit of intercepted radiation was approximately the same for both types of crops. A small improvement in the degree of fit to % N = aW−b was obtained by allowing both a and b to vary with the crop. Values of b obtained in this way for tall fescue, lucerne and winter wheat, but not for potato and sorghum, were consistent with Hardwick's ‘skin core’ hypothesis (Annals of Botany, 1989, 60, 439–46). The entire data set was, however, consistent with Caloin and Yu's model (Annals of Botany, 1984, 54, 69–76) in which there is a conceptual N pool for photosynthesis and another N pool for the other processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
CropSyst, a cropping systems simulation model
Stöckle, C. O., Donatelli, M., & Nelson, R. (2003) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s1161-0301(02)00109-0 · Cited by 1,344
Brisson, N., Mary, B., Ripoche, D., Jeuffroy, M. H., Ruget, F., Nicoullaud, B., Gate, P., Devienne-Barret, F., Antonioletti, R., Durr, C., et al. (1998) · Agronomie · doi:10.1051/agro:19980501 · Cited by 817
Ciampitti, I. A., & Vyn, T. J. (2012) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2012.03.008 · Cited by 572
Plénet, D., & Lemaire, G. (1999) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1004783431055 · Cited by 473
Self-citationProductivity and grain or seed composition: a new approach to an old problem—invited paper
Triboi, E., & Triboi-Blondel, A.-M. (2002) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s1161-0301(01)00146-0 · Cited by 351
Metadata
- Authors
- GREENWOOD, D. J., LEMAIRE, G., GOSSE, G., CRUZ, P., DRAYCOTT, A., & NEETESON, J. J.
- Venue
- Annals of Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1990-10
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 425-436
- ISSN
- 0305-7364 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-8290
- OpenAlex
- W1876282212
- Cited by
- 658
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Decline in Percentage N of C3 and C4 Crops with Increasing Plant Mass. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a088044
- The paper
- GREENWOOD, D. J., LEMAIRE, G., GOSSE, G., CRUZ, P., DRAYCOTT, A., & NEETESON, J. J. (1990). Decline in Percentage N of C3 and C4 Crops with Increasing Plant Mass. Annals of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a088044
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.