The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority
Abstract
The aim of this study was to develop a valid and reproducible index of orthodontic treatment priority. After reviewing the available literature, it was felt that this could be best achieved by using two separate components to record firstly the dental health and functional indications for treatment, and secondly the aesthetic impairment caused by the malocclusion. A modification of the index used by the Swedish Dental Health Board was used to record the need for orthodontic treatment on dental health and functional grounds. This index was modified by defining five grades, with precise dividing lines between each grade. An illustrated 10-point scale was used to assess independently the aesthetic treatment need of the patients. This scale was constructed using dental photographs of 12-year-olds collected during a large multi-disciplinary survey. Six non-dental judges rated these photographs on a visual analogue scale, and at equal intervals along the judged range, representative photographs were chosen. To test the index in use, two sample populations were defined; a group of patients referred for treatment, and a random sample of 11-12-year-old schoolchildren. Both samples were examined using the index and satisfactory levels of intra- and inter-examiner agreement were obtained.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
Cited by
Ilma de Souza Cortes, M., Marcenes, W., & Sheiham, A. (2002) · Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0528.2002.300305.x · Cited by 426
A systematic review of the relationship between overjet size and traumatic dental injuries
Nguyen, Q. (1999) · The European Journal of Orthodontics · doi:10.1093/ejo/21.5.503 · Cited by 224
A Multifactorial Analysis of Factors Associated with Dental Erosion
Dugmore, C. R., & Rock, W. P. (2004) · British Dental Journal · doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.4811041 · Cited by 222
The association of overjet size and traumatic dental injuries—A systematic review and meta-analysis
Arraj, G. P., Rossi‐Fedele, G., & Doğramacı, E. J. (2019) · Dental Traumatology · doi:10.1111/edt.12481 · Cited by 103
Maguire, A., Clarkson, J. E., Douglas, G. V., Ryan, V., Homer, T., Marshman, Z., McColl, E., Wilson, N., Vale, L., Robertson, M., et al. (2020) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta24010 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Brook, P. H., & Shaw, W. C.
- Venue
- European Journal of Orthodontics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1989-08
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 309-320
- ISSN
- 0141-5387 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2210
- OpenAlex
- W2147970028
- Cited by
- 1,154
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.ejo.a035999
- The paper
- Brook, P. H., & Shaw, W. C. (1989). The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority. European Journal of Orthodontics. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.ejo.a035999
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.