The DOI matches its Crossref record.
REVIEW
Abstract
Among those factors known to influence spermatogenesis, chromosomal aberration is perhaps the best known. A review of the literature on mitotic studies in infertile men showed that 12% of the azoospermic and severe oligozoospermic (sperm count less than 10 x 10(6)/ml) males had a karyotypic abnormality; they mainly consisted of an XXY constitution or a Robertsonian or reciprocal translocation. A similar review on meiotic studies revealed that 8% of the infertile males had some kind of cytogenetic error. Therefore, mitotic and meiotic studies are indicated in males with severe gamete impairment when the other possible causes have been eliminated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Recurrent miscarriage: aetiology, management and prognosis
Li, T. C. (2002) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/8.5.463 · Cited by 435
Bowen, J. R., Gibson, F. L., Leslie, G. I., & Saunders, D. M. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(98)10168-x · Cited by 326
Perrin, A., Morel, F., Moy, L., Colleu, D., Amice, V., & De Braekeleer, M. (2008) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.09.013 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- De Braekeleer, M., & Dao, T.-N.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1991-02
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 245-250
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2294687789
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: REVIEW. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137315
- The paper
- De Braekeleer, M., & Dao, T.-N. (1991). REVIEW. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137315
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
