The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inferring the History of Speciation from Multilocus DNA Sequence Data: The Case of Drosophila pseudoobscura and Close Relatives
Abstract
The divergence of Drosophila pseudoobscura from its close relatives, D. persimilis and D. pseudoobscura bogotana, was examined using the pattern of DNA sequence variation in a common set of 50 inbred lines at 11 loci from diverse locations in the genome. Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis show a marked excess of low-frequency variation across loci, consistent with a model of recent population expansion in both species. The different loci vary considerably, both in polymorphism levels and in the levels of polymorphisms that are shared by different species pairs. A major question we address is whether these patterns of shared variation are best explained by gene flow or by persistence since common ancestry. A new test of gene flow, based on patterns of linkage disequilibrium, is developed. The results from these, and other tests, support a model in which D. pseudoobscura and D. persimilis have exchanged genes at some loci. However, the pattern of variation suggests that most gene flow, although occurring after speciation began, was not recent. There is less evidence of gene flow between D. pseudoobscura and D. p. bogotana. The results are compared with recent work on the genomic locations of genes that contribute to reproductive isolation between D. pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. We show that there is a good correspondence between the genomic regions associated with reproductive isolation and the regions that show little or no evidence of gene flow.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Excoffier, L., Smouse, P. E., & Quattro, J. M. (1992) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/131.2.479 · Cited by 13,929
Dobzhansky, T. (1936) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/21.2.113 · Cited by 732
Cited by
Hybridization as an invasion of the genome
Mallet, J. (2005) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.02.010 · Cited by 2,196
Hybridization and adaptive radiation
Seehausen, O. (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.01.003 · Cited by 1,627
Hey, J., & Nielsen, R. (2004) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.103.024182 · Cited by 1,442
Self-citationChromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species
Noor, M. A. F., Grams, K. L., Bertucci, L. A., & Reiland, J. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.221274498 · Cited by 911
THE HIDDEN SIDE OF INVASIONS: MASSIVE INTROGRESSION BY LOCAL GENES
Currat, M., Ruedi, M., Petit, R. J., & Excoffier, L. (2008) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00413.x · Cited by 816
Metadata
- Authors
- Machado, C. A., Kliman, R. M., Markert, J. A., & Hey, J.
- Venue
- Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-04-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 472-488
- ISSN
- 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-1719
- OpenAlex
- W2098833102
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inferring the History of Speciation from Multilocus DNA Sequence Data: The Case of Drosophila pseudoobscura and Close Relatives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004103
- The paper
- Machado, C. A., Kliman, R. M., Markert, J. A., & Hey, J. (2002). Inferring the History of Speciation from Multilocus DNA Sequence Data: The Case of Drosophila pseudoobscura and Close Relatives. Molecular Biology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.