The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sex-related genes, directional sexual selection, and speciation
Abstract
Reproductive isolation and speciation can result from the establishment of either premating or postmating barriers that restrict gene flow between populations. Recent studies of speciation have been dominated by a molecular approach to dissect the genetic basis of hybrid male sterility, a specific form of postmating reproductive isolation. However, relatively little attention has been paid to the evolution of genes involved in premating isolation and genes generally involved in other sex-related functions (e.g., mating behavior, fertilization, spermatogenesis, sex determination). We have assembled DNA sequences from 51 nuclear genes and classified them based on their functional characteristics. The proportion of nonsynonymous to synonymous nucleotide substitutions were compared between Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila simulans, and Drosophila pseudoobscura, as well as between Caenorhabditis elegans and Caenorhabditis briggsae. We found a high ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions for sex-related genes (i.e., genes involved in mating behavior, fertilization, spermatogenesis, or sex determination). The results suggest that directional sexual selection has shaped the evolution of sex-related genes and that these changes have more likely occurred during the early stages of speciation. It is possible that directional selection becomes relaxed after reproductive isolation has been completed between more distantly related species (e.g., D. melanogaster and D. pseudoobscura). However, a saturation in the number of nucleotide substitutions since the time of species separation may mask any sign of directional selection between more distantly related species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mayr, E. (1963) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674865327 · Cited by 10,175
Dobzhansky, T. (1936) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/21.2.113 · Cited by 732
Cited by
The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects
Arnqvist, G., & Nilsson, T. (2000) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1446 · Cited by 1,545
The Genome Sequence of Caenorhabditis briggsae: A Platform for Comparative Genomics
Stein, L. D., Bao, Z., Blasiar, D., Blumenthal, T., Brent, M. R., Chen, N., Chinwalla, A., Clarke, L., Clee, C., Coghlan, A., et al. (2003) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0000045 · Cited by 940
Sexual selection and speciation
Panhuis, T. M., Butlin, R., Zuk, M., & Tregenza, T. (2001) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02160-7 · Cited by 887
Sexual Selection and Speciation
Ritchie, M. G. (2007) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095733 · Cited by 718
Developmental system drift and flexibility in evolutionary trajectories
True, J. R., & Haag, E. S. (2001) · Evolution & Development · doi:10.1046/j.1525-142x.2001.003002109.x · Cited by 678
Metadata
- Authors
- Civetta, A., & Singh, R. S.
- Venue
- Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-07-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 901-909
- ISSN
- 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-1719
- OpenAlex
- W2132430202
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sex-related genes, directional sexual selection, and speciation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025994
- The paper
- Civetta, A., & Singh, R. S. (1998). Sex-related genes, directional sexual selection, and speciation. Molecular Biology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025994
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.