The DOI matches its Crossref record.
CRITICA: coding region identification tool invoking comparative analysis
Open accessAbstract
Gene recognition is essential to understanding existing and future DNA sequence data. CRITICA (Coding Region Identification Tool Invoking Comparative Analysis) is a suite of programs for identifying likely protein-coding sequences in DNA by combining comparative analysis of DNA sequences with more common noncomparative methods. In the comparative component of the analysis, regions of DNA are aligned with related sequences from the DNA databases; if the translation of the aligned sequences has greater amino acid identity than expected for the observed percentage nucleotide identity, this is interpreted as evidence for coding. CRITICA also incorporates noncomparative information derived from the relative frequencies of hexanucleotides in coding frames versus other contexts (i.e., dicodon bias). The dicodon usage information is derived by iterative analysis of the data, such that CRITICA is not dependent on the existence or accuracy of coding sequence annotations in the databases. This independence makes the method particularly well suited for the analysis of novel genomes. CRITICA was tested by analyzing the available Salmonella typhimurium DNA sequences. Its predictions were compared with the DNA sequence annotations and with the predictions of GenMark. CRITICA proved to be more accurate than GenMark, and moreover, many of its predictions that would seem to be errors instead reflect problems in the sequence databases. The source code of CRITICA is freely available by anonymous FTP (rdp.life.uiuc.edu in/pub/critica) and on the World Wide Web (http:/(/)rdpwww.life.uiuc.edu).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Specific expression of long noncoding RNAs in the mouse brain
Mercer, T. R., Dinger, M. E., Sunkin, S. M., Mehler, M. F., & Mattick, J. S. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0706729105 · Cited by 1,103
A Bioinformatician's Guide to Metagenomics
Kunin, V., Copeland, A., Lapidus, A., Mavromatis, K., & Hugenholtz, P. (2008) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00009-08 · Cited by 490
(2002) · PubMed · Cited by 437
MicrobesOnline: an integrated portal for comparative and functional genomics
Dehal, P. S., Joachimiak, M. P., Price, M. N., Bates, J. T., Baumohl, J. K., Chivian, D., Friedland, G. D., Huang, K. H., Keller, K., Novichkov, P. S., et al. (2010) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkp919 · Cited by 432
Assembling the Marine Metagenome, One Cell at a Time
Woyke, T., Xie, G., Copeland, A., González, J. M., Han, C., Kiss, H., Saw, J. H., Senin, P., Yang, C., Chatterji, S., et al. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005299 · Cited by 332
Metadata
- Authors
- Badger, J. H., & Olsen, G. J.
- Venue
- Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-04-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 512-524
- ISSN
- 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-1719
- OpenAlex
- W2053150867
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CRITICA: coding region identification tool invoking comparative analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026133
- The paper
- Badger, J. H., & Olsen, G. J. (1999). CRITICA: coding region identification tool invoking comparative analysis. Molecular Biology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026133
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.