The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evidence from Beta-Tubulin Phylogeny that Microsporidia Evolved from Within the Fungi
Abstract
Microsporidia are obligate intracellular parasites that were thought to be an ancient eukaryotic lineage based on molecular phylogenies using ribosomal RNA and translation elongation factors. However, this ancient origin of microsporidia has been contested recently, as several other molecular phylogenies suggest that microsporidia are closely related to fungi. Most of the protein trees that place microsporidia with fungi are not well sampled, however, and it is impossible to resolve whether microsporidia evolved from a fungus or from a protistan relative of fungi. We have sequenced beta-tubulins from 3 microsporidia, 4 chytrid fungi, and 12 zygomycete fungi, expanding the representation of beta-tubulin to include all four fungal divisions and a wide diversity of microsporidia. In phylogenetic trees including these new sequences, the overall topology of the fungal beta-tubulins generally matched the expected relationships among the four fungal divisions, although the zygomycetes were polyphyletic in some analyses. The microsporidia consistently fell within this fungal diversification, and not as a sister group to fungi. Overall, beta-tubulin phylogeny suggests that microsporidia evolved from a fungus sometime after the divergence of chytrids. We also found that chytrid alpha- and beta-tubulins are much less divergent than are tubulins from other fungi or microsporidia. In trees in which the only fungal representatives were the chytrids, microsporidia still branched with fungi (i.e., with chytrids), suggesting that the affiliation between microsporidian and fungal tubulins is not an artifact of long-branch attraction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quartet Puzzling: A Quartet Maximum-Likelihood Method for Reconstructing Tree Topologies
Strimmer, K., & von Haeseler, A. (1996) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025664 · Cited by 2,531
How good are deep phylogenetic trees?
Philippe, H., & Laurent, J. (1998) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/s0959-437x(98)80028-2 · Cited by 324
Cited by
A higher-level phylogenetic classification of the Fungi
Hibbett, D. S., Binder, M., Bischoff, J. F., Blackwell, M., Cannon, P. F., Eriksson, O. E., Huhndorf, S., James, T., Kirk, P. M., Lücking, R., et al. (2007) · Mycological Research · doi:10.1016/j.mycres.2007.03.004 · Cited by 2,390
Eukaryotic evolution, changes and challenges
Embley, T. M., & Martin, W. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04546 · Cited by 867
The origin and evolution of model organisms
Hedges, S. B. (2002) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg929 · Cited by 806
Fungal evolution: diversity, taxonomy and phylogeny of the Fungi
Naranjo‐Ortiz, M. A., & Gabaldón, T. (2019) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12550 · Cited by 394
Topological network alignment uncovers biological function and phylogeny
Kuchaiev, O., Milenković, T., Memišević, V., Hayes, W., & Pržulj, N. (2010) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2010.0063 · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Keeling, P. J., Luker, M. A., & Palmer, J. D.
- Venue
- Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-01-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 23-31
- ISSN
- 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-1719
- OpenAlex
- W2125046038
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence from Beta-Tubulin Phylogeny that Microsporidia Evolved from Within the Fungi. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026235
- The paper
- Keeling, P. J., Luker, M. A., & Palmer, J. D. (2000). Evidence from Beta-Tubulin Phylogeny that Microsporidia Evolved from Within the Fungi. Molecular Biology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026235
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.