Cited by 210Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsChromosomal and Genetic Variations

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A comparison of the small ribosomal RNA genes from the mitochondrial DNA of the great apes and humans: sequence, structure, evolution, and phylogenetic implications.

Open access
James E. Hixson, Wesley M. Brown·1986·Molecular Biology and Evolution

Abstract

Restriction endonuclease fragments produced by EcoRI/AvaI or KpnI digestion and containing the small (12S) ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes from the mitochondrial DNAs (mtDNAs) of the common chimpanzee, pygmy chimpanzee, gorilla, and orangutan were inserted into the plasmids pBR322 or pADD1. After species verification the inserted fragments were digested with SauIIIA, subcloned into M13mp7 vectors, and sequenced. The small rRNA gene sequences were compared with each other and with the published human sequence (Anderson et al. 1981). Substitutions were detected at 118 of the 955 nucleotide positions compared. Pairwise, the sequence differences ranged from 1% (between the chimpanzee species) to 9% (comparisons involving the orangutan); the proportion that were transitions ranged from 87% to 100%. Deletions and/or additions were noted at seven locations. With respect to evolutionary sequence lability, kinetic analysis indicated the presence of at least two classes of nucleotide positions; the more labile class occurs in sequences thought to form self-complementary duplexes (stems) in the mature rRNA. The high frequency of compensating substitutions, which maintain base-pairing within these sequences, corroborates their inferred structure. Phylogenetic inferences drawn from the sequence comparisons support the notion of an approximately equidistant relationship among chimpanzees, gorilla, and man, with the orangutan much less closely related. However, inference from a shared deletion suggests that the gorilla and the chimpanzees may be more closely related to one another than they are to man.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040379

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. BENVENISTE, R. E. 1985. The contributions of the retroviruses to the study of mammalian evolution. Pp. 359-4 17 in R. H. MACINTYRE, ed. Molecular evolutionary genetics. Plenum, New York.
  2. BROWN, W. M., M. GEORGE JR., and A. C. WILSON. 1979. Rapid evolution of mitochondrial DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76: 1967-I97 1.
  3. CLEWELL, D. D., and D. R. HELINSKY. 1969. Supercoiled circular DNA-protein complex in Escherichia colt purification and induced conversion to an open circular DNA form. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 62: 1159-1166.
  4. FARRIS, J. S. 198 1. Distance data in phylogenetic analysis. Pp. 3-23 in V. FUNK and D. BROOKS, eds. Advances in cladistics. New York Botanical Gardens, Bronx, New York.
  5. FERRIS, S. D., W. M. BROWN, W. S. DAVIDSON, and A. C. WILSON. 198 la. Extensive poly- morphism in the mitochondrial DNA of apes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78:63 19-6323.
  6. GOODMAN, M. 1963. Man's place in the phylogeny of the primates. Pp. 204-234 in S. L. WASHBURN, ed. Classification and human evolution. Aldine, Chicago.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–210 of 210

Metadata

Authors
Hixson, J. E., & Brown, W. M.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Molecular Biology and Evolution
Published
1986-01
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
1-18
ISSN
  • 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-1719
OpenAlex
W2101293289
Cited by
210
References
50
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Biology and Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Cancer Research Institute
  • University of Michigan
  • U.S. Public Health Service
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM-30144, GM-07544)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR 07050)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
Keywords
mitochondrial DNA, great apes, human, chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas, orangutans, sequence comparison, nucleotide substitution, base pairing, secondary structure, phylogenetic relationships
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, Cloning, Molecular, DNA, Mitochondrial, DNA, Ribosomal, Genes, Humans, Hydrogen Bonding, Molecular Sequence Data, Nucleic Acid Conformation, RNA, Ribosomal, Hominidae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review