The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The analysis of population survey data on DNA sequence variation.
Open accessAbstract
A technique is presented for the partitioning of nucleotide diversity into within- and between-population components for the case in which multiple populations have been surveyed for restriction-site variation. This allows the estimation of an analogue of FST at the DNA level. Approximate expressions are given for the variance of these estimates resulting from nucleotide, individual, and population sampling. Application of the technique to existing studies on mitochondrial DNA in several animal species and on several nuclear genes in Drosophila indicates that the standard errors of genetic diversity estimates are usually quite large. Thus, comparative studies of nucleotide diversity need to be substantially larger than the current standards. Normally, only a very small fraction of the sampling variance is caused by sampling of individuals. Even when 20 or so restriction enzymes are employed, nucleotide sampling is a major source of error, and population sampling is often quite important. Generally, the degree of population subdivision at the nucleotide level is comparable with that at the haplotype level, but significant differences do arise as a result of inequalities in the genetic distances between haplotypes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolution of Protein Molecules
JUKES, T. H., & CANTOR, C. R. (1969) · Mammalian Protein Metabolism · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-3211-9.50009-7 · Cited by 11,032
Mitochondrial DNA and human evolution
Cann, R. L., Stoneking, M., & Wilson, A. C. (1987) · Nature · doi:10.1038/325031a0 · Cited by 3,100
Cited by
Excoffier, L., Smouse, P. E., & Quattro, J. M. (1992) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/131.2.479 · Cited by 13,929
ISOLATION BY DISTANCE IN EQUILIBRIUM AND NON-EQUILIBRIUM POPULATIONS
Slatkin, M. (1993) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb01215.x · Cited by 2,588
Estimation of levels of gene flow from DNA sequence data.
Hudson, R. R., Slatkin, M., & Maddison, W. P. (1992) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/132.2.583 · Cited by 1,753
Michalakis, Y., & Excoffier, L. (1996) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/142.3.1061 · Cited by 935
Carnaval, A. C., & Moritz, C. (2008) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2007.01870.x · Cited by 837
Metadata
- Venue
- Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1990-07
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 377-94
- ISSN
- 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-1719
- OpenAlex
- W2138902064
- Cited by
- 547
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The analysis of population survey data on DNA sequence variation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040607
- The paper
- The analysis of population survey data on DNA sequence variation. (1990). Molecular Biology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040607
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.