The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Acetyl-CoA Carboxylase in Higher Plants: Most Plants Other Than Gramineae Have Both the Prokaryotic and the Eukaryotic Forms of This Enzyme
Abstract
The presence and the absence of a prokaryote type and a eukaryote type of acetyl-CoA carboxylase (EC 6.4.1.2; ACCase) were examined in members of 28 plant families by two distinct methods: the detection of biotinylated subunits of ACCase with a streptavidin probe, and the detection of the accD gene, which encodes a subunit of the prokaryotic ACCase, by Southern hybridization analysis. The protein extracts of all the plants studied contained a biotinylated polypeptide of 220 kDa, which was probably the eukaryotic ACCase. All the plants but those belonging to Gramineae also contained a biotinylated polypeptide of ca. 35 kDa, which is a putative subunit of the prokaryotic ACCase. In all plants but those in Gramineae, the ca. 35 kDa polypeptide was found in the protein extracts of plastids, while the 220 kDa polypeptide was absent from these plastid extracts. The plastid extracts of the plants in Gramineae contained the 220 kDa polypeptide, as did the homogenates of the leaves. Southern hybridization analysis demonstrated that all the plants but those in the Gramineae contained the accD gene. These findings suggest that most higher plants have the prokaryotic ACCase in the plastids and the eukaryotic ACCase in the cytosol. Only Gramineae plants might contain the eukaryotic ACCases both in the plastids and in the cytosol. The origin of the plastid-located eukaryotic ACCase in Gramineae is discussed as the first possible example of substitution of a plastid gene by a nuclear gene for a non-ribosomal component.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Millen, R. S., Olmstead, R. G., Adams, K. L., Palmer, J. D., Lao, N. T., Heggie, L., Kavanagh, T. A., Hibberd, J. M., Gray, J. C., Morden, C. W., et al. (2001) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.13.3.645 · Cited by 503
Li-Beisson, Y., Shorrosh, B., Beisson, F., Andersson, M. X., Arondel, V., Bates, P. D., Baud, S., Bird, D., DeBono, A., Durrett, T. P., et al. (2010) · The Arabidopsis Book · doi:10.1199/tab.0133 · Cited by 367
Unkefer, C. J., Sayre, R. T., Magnuson, J. K., Anderson, D. B., Baxter, I., Blaby, I. K., Brown, J. K., Carleton, M., Cattolico, R. A., Dale, T., et al. (2017) · Algal Research · doi:10.1016/j.algal.2016.06.002 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Konishi, T., Shinohara, K., Yamada, K., & Sasaki, Y.
- Venue
- Plant and Cell Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-03-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 117-122
- ISSN
- 0032-0781 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-9053
- OpenAlex
- W2147680318
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Acetyl-CoA Carboxylase in Higher Plants: Most Plants Other Than Gramineae Have Both the Prokaryotic and the Eukaryotic Forms of This Enzyme. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a028920
- The paper
- Konishi, T., Shinohara, K., Yamada, K., & Sasaki, Y. (1996). Acetyl-CoA Carboxylase in Higher Plants: Most Plants Other Than Gramineae Have Both the Prokaryotic and the Eukaryotic Forms of This Enzyme. Plant and Cell Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a028920
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.