The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Light Environment within a Leaf I. Optical Properties of Paradermal Sections of Camellia Leaves with Special Reference to Differences in the Optical Properties of Palisade and Spongy Tissues
Abstract
The attenuance (apparent absorbance), angular distribution of transmitted light (scattering) and reflectance of paradermal sections of Camellia leaves were measured spectrophotometrically and the data for the palisade and spongy tissues were compared. Attenuance in tissues could be expressed by Beer's law only for wavelengths of strong absorption. At 680 nm, the apparent extinction coefficient of chlorophyll (e) for the spongy tissue was about 1.4 times that for the palisade tissue. The larger e for the spongy tissue is attributable mostly to the more effective increase in the pathlength of light due to scattering at the interfaces between the air space and cells because the difference between e for the two tissues was minimized by infiltration of the air space in the tissues with a medium whose refractive index was similar to the index of the leaf cells. Scattering was larger for wavelengths of weak absorption, and the relative increase in attenuance caused by elongating the optical pathlength was even more prominent. Based on these data, we report an ecophysiological discussion of the internal light environment of a leaf and the meaning of the differentiation of mesophyll into the palisade and spongy tissues.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Evans, J. R., & Poorter, H. (2001) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.2001.00724.x · Cited by 1,229
Impact of light limitation on seagrasses
Ralph, P. J., Durako, M. J., Enríquez, S., Collier, C. J., & Doblin, M. A. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2007.06.017 · Cited by 501
Fan, X.-X., Xu, Z.-G., Liu, X.-Y., Tang, C.-M., Wang, L.-W., & Han, X.-L. (2013) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2013.01.017 · Cited by 419
Comparative ecophysiology of leaf and canopy photosynthesis
TERASHIMA, I., & HIKOSAKA, K. (1995) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00623.x · Cited by 417
Self-citationPhotosynthetic light-response curves: I. The influence of CO2 partial pressure and leaf inversion
�gren, E., & Evans, J. R. (1993) · Planta · doi:10.1007/bf00195075 · Cited by 351
Metadata
- Authors
- Terashima, I., & Saeki, T.
- Venue
- Plant and Cell Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1983-12
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1493-1501
- ISSN
- 0032-0781 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-9053
- OpenAlex
- W1908741105
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Light Environment within a Leaf I. Optical Properties of Paradermal Sections of Camellia Leaves with Special Reference to Differences in the Optical Properties of Palisade and Spongy Tissues. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a076672
- The paper
- Terashima, I., & Saeki, T. (1983). Light Environment within a Leaf I. Optical Properties of Paradermal Sections of Camellia Leaves with Special Reference to Differences in the Optical Properties of Palisade and Spongy Tissues. Plant and Cell Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a076672
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.