The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of Light and Nitrogen Nutrition on the Organization of the Photosynthetic Apparatus in Spinach
Abstract
Nitrogen budgets of fully expanded young leaves of Spinacia oleracea L. grown under three growth irradiances at four nitrate concentrations, were compared in relation to photosynthesis. The proportion of nitrogen allocated to thylakoid membranes was 24% of total leaf nitrogen irrespective of the growth conditions. The composition of the photosynthetic components in thylakoid membranes was affected by growth irradiance but unaffected by nitrogen levels. The proportion of total leaf nitrogen allocated to soluble protein and RuBP carboxylase (RuBPCase) increased with the increases in nitrogen and in irradiance levels. Some ultrastructural properties of chloroplasts and their intra-leaf gradients were also compared. The results suggest that nitrogen nutrition affects the amount of thyalkoids per unit leaf area but neither the properties of thyalkoids nor their intra-leaf gradient. Growth irradiance, however, controls both the properties and the amount of thylakoids. The ratio of in vitro RuBPCase activity to electron transport/photophosphorylation activity increased with the increase in nitrogen level, but decreased with the increase in growth irradiance. The change in the ratio of in vitro activities may serve to balance the in vivo activities, given that the in vivo efficiency of RuBPCase declines with the increase in volume of a chloroplast due to the increased liquid phase resistance to CO2 diffusion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Comparative photosynthesis of sun and shade plants
Boardman, N. K. (1977) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.28.060177.002035 · Cited by 1,826
Cited by
Photosynthesis and nitrogen relationships in leaves of C3 plants
Evans, J. R. (1989) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00377192 · Cited by 3,400
Improving photosynthetic efficiency for greater yield.
Zhu, X.-G., Long, S. P., & Ort, D. R. (2010) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112206 · Cited by 1,902
Evans, J. R., & Poorter, H. (2001) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.2001.00724.x · Cited by 1,229
Self-citationSTITT, M., & KRAPP, A. (1999) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00386.x · Cited by 1,044
(2005) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781420027877 · Cited by 834
Metadata
- Venue
- Plant and Cell Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1988-01
- ISSN
- 0032-0781 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-9053
- OpenAlex
- W2170922186
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Light and Nitrogen Nutrition on the Organization of the Photosynthetic Apparatus in Spinach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a077461
- The paper
- Effects of Light and Nitrogen Nutrition on the Organization of the Photosynthetic Apparatus in Spinach. (1988). Plant and Cell Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a077461
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.