The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Can general practice data be used for needs assessment and health care planning in an inner-London district?
Abstract
Background The development of primary care led commissioning will increase the need for practice-based information on health and morbidity, and the NHS information strategy recommends that routinely collected health and morbidity information held on general practice computer systems should be use to inform local health needs assessment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of information in six computerized practices. Methods A comparison was carried out of the recording of registration and social information, health risk factors, medication and record on consultations on the computer and in the manual records for a sample of patients, with an audit of morbidity coding by computer. A comparison was made of computerized disease registers with prescribing for diseases. Results Computer disease registers identified over 90 percent of diabetic patients on medication, 67 percent of asthmatics, 61 percent of epileptics, and 48 percent of patients with angina. Computer recording of problems was inconsistent; practices which recorded clinical information from every consultation did not have substantially more complete disease registers. Over 90 percent of encounters and prescriptions were computerized, but there was bias in recording consultation problems. Blood pressure, smoking, alcohol, weight and height were recorded for over 50 percent of patients aged 15-74, and computerized for 79 percent (291/370) for height, but only 56 percent (274/488) for the most recent bloo…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Other methods for assessing completeness included looking at agreement between elements from the same source,49–55 56 agreement between the EHR and paper records,79 87 88 agreement between the EHR and another electronic source of data,79 89 and comparing distributions of occurrences of certain elements between practices97 or with nationally recorded rates.98–100”
From Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: enabling reuse for clinical research (2013) · cites this paper as [79]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Weiskopf, N. G., & Weng, C. (2013) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000681 · Cited by 1,216
Systematic review of scope and quality of electronic patient record data in primary care
Thiru, K., Hassey, A., & Sullivan, F. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7398.1070 · Cited by 342
Real world data—retrieval and validation of consultation data from four general practices
Neal, R. D., Heywood, P. L., & Morley, S. (1996) · Family Practice · doi:10.1093/fampra/13.5.455 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Scobie, S., Basnett, I., & McCartney, P.
- Affiliations
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- ORCID
- Sarah Scobie
- Venue
- Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 475-83
- ISSN
- 0943-1853 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3850
- OpenAlex
- W2337672980
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
- Keywords
- health needs assessment, health planning, disease registries, health risk factors, prescribing data
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Data Collection, Family Practice, Female, Health Planning, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, London, Male, Medical Audit, Middle Aged, Morbidity, Referral and Consultation, Registries, Urban Health
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Can general practice data be used for needs assessment and health care planning in an inner-London district? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a043166
- The paper
- Scobie, S., Basnett, I., & McCartney, P. (1995). Can general practice data be used for needs assessment and health care planning in an inner-London district? Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a043166