Cited by 218Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionFrailty in Older Adults

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

Syncope in an Elderly, Institutionalised Population: Prevalence, Incidence, and Associated Risk

LIPSITZ, LEWIS A., WEI, JEANNE Y., ROWE, JOHN W.·1985·QJM: An International Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Although syncope is common in the elderly, little is known of its epidemiology and prognosis. A retrospective analysis of syncope in 711 very old (mean age 87 years) institutionalised patients revealed a 10 year prevalence of 23 per cent and one year incidence of 7 per cent. A two-year prospective follow-up of this population revealed a yearly incidence of 6 per cent and recurrence rate of 30 per cent. Of 67 patients who developed syncope during follow-up, a cause was established in 46; 14 (21 per cent) had cardiac and 32 (48 per cent) had non-cardiac aetiologies. Twenty-one cases (31 per cent) remained unexplained. Patients who developed syncope were initially more functionally disabled (p = 0.003) and subsequently changed function more frequently (p = 0.03) than those without the development of syncope, but two year rates of hospitalisation and death were not different between the two groups. Life-table survival analysis showed no difference in the mortality of subgroups with cardiac, non-cardiac, and unknown aetiologies of syncope. Syncope is common in multiply impaired elders and is likely a manifestation of co-morbid disease rather than an independent contributor to mortality.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.qjmed.a067852

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Older institutionalized patients have a 7% annual incidence of syncope, a 23% overall prevalence, and a 30% 2-year recurrence rate.

    “Older institutionalized patients have a 7% annual incidence of syncope, a 23% overall prevalence, and a 30% 2-year recurrence rate (56).”

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 218

Metadata

Authors
LIPSITZ, L. A., WEI, J. Y., & ROWE, J. W.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
LIPSITZ, LEWIS A.
Venue
QJM: An International Journal of Medicine
Published
1985-04-01
Volume
55
Issue
1
Pages
45-54
ISSN
  • 0033-5622 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2393
  • 1460-2725
OpenAlex
W2254686332
Cited by
218
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 12
FWCI
5.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • QJM (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (AG00599, AG 04390)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL-29295)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
Keywords
syncope, older adults, institutionalized patients, prevalence, incidence, recurrence, cardiac syncope, functional disability, mortality, comorbidities
MeSH terms
Aged, Boston, Female, Heart Diseases, Humans, Institutionalization, Male, Mortality, Prospective Studies, Retrospective Studies, Risk, Syncope

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review