The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
Syncope in an Elderly, Institutionalised Population: Prevalence, Incidence, and Associated Risk
Abstract
Although syncope is common in the elderly, little is known of its epidemiology and prognosis. A retrospective analysis of syncope in 711 very old (mean age 87 years) institutionalised patients revealed a 10 year prevalence of 23 per cent and one year incidence of 7 per cent. A two-year prospective follow-up of this population revealed a yearly incidence of 6 per cent and recurrence rate of 30 per cent. Of 67 patients who developed syncope during follow-up, a cause was established in 46; 14 (21 per cent) had cardiac and 32 (48 per cent) had non-cardiac aetiologies. Twenty-one cases (31 per cent) remained unexplained. Patients who developed syncope were initially more functionally disabled (p = 0.003) and subsequently changed function more frequently (p = 0.03) than those without the development of syncope, but two year rates of hospitalisation and death were not different between the two groups. Life-table survival analysis showed no difference in the mortality of subgroups with cardiac, non-cardiac, and unknown aetiologies of syncope. Syncope is common in multiply impaired elders and is likely a manifestation of co-morbid disease rather than an independent contributor to mortality.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Older institutionalized patients have a 7% annual incidence of syncope, a 23% overall prevalence, and a 30% 2-year recurrence rate.
“Older institutionalized patients have a 7% annual incidence of syncope, a 23% overall prevalence, and a 30% 2-year recurrence rate (56).”
From 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Syncope (2017) · cites this paper as [56]
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 218
Metadata
- Authors
- LIPSITZ, L. A., WEI, J. Y., & ROWE, J. W.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- LIPSITZ, LEWIS A.
- Venue
- QJM: An International Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1985-04-01
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 45-54
- ISSN
- 0033-5622 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2393
- 1460-2725
- OpenAlex
- W2254686332
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 5.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- QJM (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (AG00599, AG 04390)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL-29295)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
- Keywords
- syncope, older adults, institutionalized patients, prevalence, incidence, recurrence, cardiac syncope, functional disability, mortality, comorbidities
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Boston, Female, Heart Diseases, Humans, Institutionalization, Male, Mortality, Prospective Studies, Retrospective Studies, Risk, Syncope
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review