The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Endogenous electric fields in embryos during development, regeneration and wound healing
Abstract
All embryos that have been investigated drive ionic currents through themselves and these currents will generate internal electric fields. Here, those examples in which such fields have been measured directly are discussed. The first such measurements were made in chick embryos and about 20 mV mm(-1) was measured near the posterior intestinal portal in 2-4 day-old embryos. This electric field is important for the development of tail structures because reducing its magnitude results in abnormal tail development. The second embryonic electric field measured directly was in the axolotl, where a rostral-caudal field of about the same magnitude was detected. Modification of this field during neurulation but not gastrulation caused developmental abnormalities. Most recently, the development of left-right asymmetry in frog and chick embryos was found to require a voltage difference between blastomeres at a very early developmental stage. This field was measured in the chick embryo to be 10-20 mV mm(-1) across the primitive streak. Mammalian skin wounds generate 150 mV mm(-1) fields lateral to the wound and corneal epidermal wounds exhibit lateral fields of 40 mV mm(-1). The presence of these endogenous fields would suggest that exposures to external electric fields should be limited to magnitudes of less than 0.1 V m(-1).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Membrane potential and cancer progression
Yang, M., & Brackenbury, W. J. (2013) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2013.00185 · Cited by 614
Thrivikraman, G., Boda, S. K., & Basu, B. (2018) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.10.003 · Cited by 384
Adams, D. S., Robinson, K. R., Fukumoto, T., Yuan, S., Albertson, R. C., Yelick, P., Kuo, L., McSweeney, M., & Levin, M. (2006) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.02341 · Cited by 269
Damaraju, S. M., Shen, Y., Elele, E., Khusid, B., Eshghinejad, A., Li, J., Jaffe, M., & Arinzeh, T. L. (2017) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.09.024 · Cited by 265
Membrane Potential Controls Adipogenic and Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Sundelacruz, S., Levin, M., & Kaplan, D. L. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003737 · Cited by 249
Metadata
- Authors
- Nuccitelli, R.
- Venue
- Radiation Protection Dosimetry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-10-01
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 375-383
- ISSN
- 0144-8420 (ISSN-L)
- 1742-3406
- OpenAlex
- W2062124379
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Endogenous electric fields in embryos during development, regeneration and wound healing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006375
- The paper
- Nuccitelli, R. (2003). Endogenous electric fields in embryos during development, regeneration and wound healing. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006375
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.