The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biological Weighting Function for RBE Specification of Neutron Therapy Beams. Intercomparison of 9 European Centres
Abstract
Microdosimetric measurements (0.5 inch TEPC, 2 µm simulated diameter) were performed in similar conditions for 14 neutron beams with energies ranging from p(4)+Be to p(65)+Be used for radiobiology and therapy. They were collected in an intercomparison programme currently carried out by the EORTC at European facilities and aimed at the comparison of the radiation quality (in terms of RBE) of a given neutron beam with a reference neutron beam. Indeed, accurate physical and biological characteristics for these beams are urgently required. The large RBE differences (up to 50%) observed between different Neutron Therapy Centres must be accurately (<±5%) taken into account for the comparison of clinical results. In order to provide a practicable solution to the existing and unsolved problem of accounting for radiation quality variations in neutron therapy, RBE against lineal energy weighting functions have been established by unfolding methods using radiobiological data and microdosimetric spectra obtained under identical conditions at the neutron beams investigated. This empirical procedure enabled the determination of the best accuracy achievable in predicting RBE variations between neutron beams using their weighted mean lineal energy.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“To our knowledge few RBE models for neutrons exist all together, from older applications to neutron therapy1819 up to recent neutron RBE for DNA damage induction20”
From The origin of neutron biological effectiveness as a function of energy (2016) · cites this paper as [19]
In the citing paper
“and the one here presented for clustered DNA damage induction is the first fully based on ab-initio calculations starting from physical interactions.”
From The origin of neutron biological effectiveness as a function of energy (2016) · cites this paper as [19]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The origin of neutron biological effectiveness as a function of energy
Baiocco, G., Barbieri, S., Babini, G., Morini, J., Alloni, D., Friedland, W., Kundrát, P., Schmitt, E., Puchalska, M., Sihver, L., et al. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep34033 · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Authors
- Pihet, P., Menzel, H. G., Schmidt, R., Beauduin, M., & Wambersie, A.
- Venue
- Radiation Protection Dosimetry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1990-06-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1-4
- Pages
- 437-442
- ISSN
- 0144-8420 (ISSN-L)
- 1742-3406
- OpenAlex
- W2597200061
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Radiation Protection Dosimetry (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
- Keywords
- neutron therapy, relative biological effectiveness, biological weighting functions, microdosimetry, unfolding method, radiation quality, neutron beam, EORTC
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biological Weighting Function for RBE Specification of Neutron Therapy Beams. Intercomparison of 9 European Centres. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a080709
- The paper
- Pihet, P., Menzel, H. G., Schmidt, R., Beauduin, M., & Wambersie, A. (1990). Biological Weighting Function for RBE Specification of Neutron Therapy Beams. Intercomparison of 9 European Centres. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a080709