The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Latent Class Modeling with Covariates: Two Improved Three-Step Approaches
Abstract
Researchers using latent class (LC) analysis often proceed using the following three steps: (1) an LC model is built for a set of response variables, (2) subjects are assigned to LCs based on their posterior class membership probabilities, and (3) the association between the assigned class membership and external variables is investigated using simple cross-tabulations or multinomial logistic regression analysis. Bolck, Croon, and Hagenaars (2004) demonstrated that such a three-step approach underestimates the associations between covariates and class membership. They proposed resolving this problem by means of a specific correction method that involves modifying the third step. In this article, I extend the correction method of Bolck, Croon, and Hagenaars by showing that it involves maximizing a weighted log-likelihood function for clustered data. This conceptualization makes it possible to apply the method not only with categorical but also with continuous explanatory variables, to obtain correct tests using complex sampling variance estimation methods, and to implement it in standard software for logistic regression analysis. In addition, a new maximum likelihood (ML)—based correction method is proposed, which is more direct in the sense that it does not require analyzing weighted data. This new three-step ML method can be easily implemented in software for LC analysis. The reported simulation study shows that both correction methods perform very well in the sense that their parameter estimates and their SEs can be trusted, except for situations with very poorly separated classes. The main advantage of the ML method compared with the Bolck, Croon, and Hagenaars approach is that it is much more efficient and almost as efficient as one-step ML estimation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys
Rubin, D. B. (1987) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316696 · Cited by 20,701
McLachlan, G., & Peel, D. (2000) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471721182 · Cited by 10,991
Hapeman, D. E. (1991) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1991.10484817 · Cited by 9,373
Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data
Schafer, J. L. (1997) · doi:10.1201/9781439821862 · Cited by 6,012
Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data
Booth, D. E. (2000) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.2000.10486013 · Cited by 5,627
Mayer, T. F., Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Henry, N. W. (1969) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092222 · Cited by 2,384
McCutcheon, A. (1987) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412984713 · Cited by 2,034
Exploratory latent structure analysis using both identifiable and unidentifiable models
GOODMAN, L. A. (1974) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/61.2.215 · Cited by 1,637
The SAGE Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods
Lewis-Beck, M., Bryman, A., & Futing Liao, T. (2004) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412950589 · Cited by 1,439
Estimating latent structure models with categorical variables: one-step versus three-step estimators
Bolck, A., Croon, M., & Hagenaars, J. (2004) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mph001 · Cited by 1,406
Cited by
Latent class analysis: a guide to best practice
Weller, B. E., Bowen, N. K., & Faubert, S. J. (2020) · Journal of Black Psychology · doi:10.1177/0095798420930932 · Cited by 2,223
Ferguson, S. L., G. Moore, E. W., & Hull, D. M. (2020) · International Journal of Behavioral Development · doi:10.1177/0165025419881721 · Cited by 911
The GRoLTS-Checklist: Guidelines for Reporting on Latent Trajectory Studies
van de Schoot, R., Sijbrandij, M., Winter, S. D., Depaoli, S., & Vermunt, J. K. (2017) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705511.2016.1247646 · Cited by 721
Self-citationMultiple-Group Analysis of Similarity in Latent Profile Solutions
Morin, A. J. S., Meyer, J. P., Creusier, J., & Biétry, F. (2016) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428115621148 · Cited by 664
Bakk, Z., Tekle, F. B., & Vermunt, J. K. (2013) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.1177/0081175012470644 · Cited by 629
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Vermunt, J. K.
- Venue
- Political Analysis
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 450-469
- ISSN
- 1047-1987 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4989
- OpenAlex
- W2018516812
- Cited by
- 2,343
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 18.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Latent Class Modeling with Covariates: Two Improved Three-Step Approaches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/pan/mpq025
- The paper
- Vermunt, J. K. (2010). Latent Class Modeling with Covariates: Two Improved Three-Step Approaches. Political Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpq025
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.