Cited by 435Astrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena

ASCA View of Our Galactic Center: Remains of Past Activities in X-Rays?

Koyama, Katsuji, Maeda, Yoshitomo, Sonobe, Takashi, Takeshima, Toshiaki, Tanaka, Yasuo, Yamauchi, Shigeo·1996·Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan

Abstract

Detailed X-ray images and spectra of the galactic-center region up to 10 keV were obtained with ASCA. Diffuse thermal-emission with distinct Kα lines from highly ionized ions of various elements has confirmed the presence of an extended high-temperature plasma. The fluorescent X-ray emission from cold iron atoms in molecular clouds was also found, possibly due to irradiation by X-rays from the center, which was bright in the past, but is presently dim. The results suggest that the galactic center exhibited intermittent activities with a time-averaged energy generation rate comparable to Seyfert nuclei, a class of active galactic nuclei.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/pasj/48.2.249

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Observations of fluorescent Fe Kα line (at ≈6.4 keV) in several molecular clouds around Sgr A* indicate an X-ray luminosity LX~10^39 erg/s (mechanical luminosity 10^41-42 erg/s).

    “Observations of fluorescent Fe K α line (at ≈ 6 . 4 keV) in several molecular clouds (including at Sgr B2 and Sgr C cloud complexes) around Sgr A ∗ indicates an X-ray luminosity of LX ∼ 10 39 erg s -1 (mechanical luminosity of 10 41 -42 erg s -1 ) (Koyama et al. 1996; Murakami et al. 2001; Inui et al. 2009).”

    From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Koyama et al. 1996

  • The assumed wind power is consistent with the X-ray reflection nebulae constraints.

    “The assumed wind power is consistent with the X-ray reflection nebulae constraints (section 3.3; Koyama et al. 1996; Murakami et al. 2001; Inui et al. 2009).”

    From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Koyama et al. 1996

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 435

Authors
Koyama, K., Maeda, Y., Sonobe, T., Takeshima, T., Tanaka, Y., & Yamauchi, S.
Affiliations
  • Kyoto University (JP)
  • Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (JP)
  • Goddard Space Flight Center (US)
  • Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics (DE)
  • Iwate University (JP)
Venue
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan
Published
1996-04-01
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
249-255
ISSN
  • 0004-6264 (ISSN-L)
  • 2053-051X
OpenAlex
W2032372224
Cited by
435
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 17
FWCI
12.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Keywords
Galactic Center, X-ray emission, highly ionized plasma, molecular clouds, iron K-alpha line, high-temperature plasma, Seyfert nuclei, active galactic nuclei, ASCA observations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review