The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Delay Time Distribution Measurement of Type Ia Supernovae by the Subaru/XMM-Newton Deep Survey and Implications for the Progenitor
Open accessAbstract
The delay time distribution (DTD) of type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) from star formation is an important clue to reveal the still unknown progenitor system of SNe Ia. Here, we report on a measurement of the SN Ia DTD in a delay time range of $t_{\rm Ia} = $ 0.1-8.0Gyr by using faint variable objects detected in the Subaru/XMM-Newton Deep Survey (SXDS) down to $i'$$\sim$ 25.5. We selected 65 SN candidates showing significant spatial offset from the nuclei of the host galaxies having an old stellar population at $z$$\sim$ 0.4-1.2, out of more than 1000 SXDS variable objects. Although spectroscopic type classification is not available for these, we quantitatively demonstrated that more than $\sim$80% of these should be SNe Ia. The DTD was derived using stellar age estimates of the old galaxies based on 9 band photometries from optical to mid-infrared wavelength. Combined with the observed SN Ia rate in elliptical galaxies at the local universe, the DTD in $t_{\rm Ia}$$\sim$ 0.1-10Gyr is well described by a featureless power-law as $f_{\rm D}$($t_{\rm Ia}$) $\propto$$t_{\rm Ia}^\alpha$ with $\alpha$$\sim$$-$1. The derived DTD is in excellent agreement with a generic prediction of the double-degenerate scenario, giving strong support to this scenario. In the single-degenerate (SD) scenario, although predictions by simple analytic formulations have broad DTD shapes that are similar to the observation, DTD shapes calculated by more detailed binary population synthesis tend to have strong peaks at characteristic time scales, which do not fit the observation. This result thus indicates either that the SD channel is not the major contributor to SNe Ia in an old stellar population, or that an improvement of binary population synthesis theory is required. Various sources of systematic uncertainties were examined and tested, but our main conclusions were not affected significantly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant
Riess, A. G., Filippenko, A. V., Challis, P., Clocchiatti, A., Diercks, A., Garnavich, P. M., Gilliland, R. L., Hogan, C. J., Jha, S., Kirshner, R. P., et al. (1998) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/300499 · Cited by 19,704
Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High‐Redshift Supernovae
Perlmutter, S., Aldering, G., Goldhaber, G., Knop, R. A., Nugent, P., Castro, P. G., Deustua, S., Fabbro, S., Goobar, A., Groom, D. E., et al. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307221 · Cited by 18,062
Stellar population synthesis at the resolution of 2003
Bruzual, G., & Charlot, S. (2003) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x · Cited by 10,500
Galactic Stellar and Substellar Initial Mass Function
Chabrier, G. (2003) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/376392 · Cited by 9,071
The Dust Content and Opacity of Actively Star‐forming Galaxies
Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., Kinney, A. L., Koornneef, J., & Storchi‐Bergmann, T. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/308692 · Cited by 5,717
Galactic Stellar and Substellar Initial Mass FunctionPreprint
Chabrier, G. (2003) · Cited by 4,970
Confidence limits for small numbers of events in astrophysical data
Gehrels, N. (1986) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/164079 · Cited by 2,412
Double white dwarfs as progenitors of R Coronae Borealis stars and Type I supernovae
Webbink, R. F. (1984) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/161701 · Cited by 2,331
Allen's Astrophysical Quantities
Cox, A. N., & Pilachowski, C. A. (2000) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.1325201 · Cited by 2,271
Allen’s Astrophysical Quantities
(2002) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1186-0 · Cited by 1,727
Cited by
Eldridge, J. J., Stanway, E. R., Xiao, L., McClelland, L. A. S., Taylor, G., Ng, M., Greis, S. M. L., & Bray, J. C. (2017) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1017/pasa.2017.51 · Cited by 1,019
THE CLUSTER LENSING AND SUPERNOVA SURVEY WITH HUBBLE: AN OVERVIEW
Postman, M., Coe, D., Benítez, N., Bradley, L., Broadhurst, T., Donahue, M., Ford, H., Graur, O., Graves, G., Jouvel, S., et al. (2012) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/199/2/25 · Cited by 849
Progenitors of type Ia supernovae
Wang, B., & Han, Z. (2012) · New Astronomy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.newar.2012.04.001 · Cited by 377
Towards an understanding of Type Ia supernovae from a synthesis of theory and observations
Hillebrandt, W., Kromer, M., Röpke, F. K., & Ruiter, A. J. (2013) · Frontiers of Physics · doi:10.1007/s11467-013-0303-2 · Cited by 289
Metadata
- Authors
- Totani, T., Morokuma, T., Oda, T., Doi, M., & Yasuda, N.
- Venue
- Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-12-25
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1327-1346
- ISSN
- 0004-6264 (ISSN-L)
- 2053-051X
- OpenAlex
- W2061347162
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 11.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Delay Time Distribution Measurement of Type Ia Supernovae by the Subaru/XMM-Newton Deep Survey and Implications for the Progenitor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/pasj/60.6.1327
- The paper
- Totani, T., Morokuma, T., Oda, T., Doi, M., & Yasuda, N. (2008). Delay Time Distribution Measurement of Type Ia Supernovae by the Subaru/XMM-Newton Deep Survey and Implications for the Progenitor. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan. https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/60.6.1327
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.