Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 255

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Delay Time Distribution Measurement of Type Ia Supernovae by the Subaru/XMM-Newton Deep Survey and Implications for the Progenitor

Open access
Totani, Tomonori, Morokuma, Tomoki, Oda, Takeshi, Doi, Mamoru, Yasuda, Naoki·2008·Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan

Abstract

The delay time distribution (DTD) of type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) from star formation is an important clue to reveal the still unknown progenitor system of SNe Ia. Here, we report on a measurement of the SN Ia DTD in a delay time range of $t_{\rm Ia} = $ 0.1-8.0Gyr by using faint variable objects detected in the Subaru/XMM-Newton Deep Survey (SXDS) down to $i'$$\sim$ 25.5. We selected 65 SN candidates showing significant spatial offset from the nuclei of the host galaxies having an old stellar population at $z$$\sim$ 0.4-1.2, out of more than 1000 SXDS variable objects. Although spectroscopic type classification is not available for these, we quantitatively demonstrated that more than $\sim$80% of these should be SNe Ia. The DTD was derived using stellar age estimates of the old galaxies based on 9 band photometries from optical to mid-infrared wavelength. Combined with the observed SN Ia rate in elliptical galaxies at the local universe, the DTD in $t_{\rm Ia}$$\sim$ 0.1-10Gyr is well described by a featureless power-law as $f_{\rm D}$($t_{\rm Ia}$) $\propto$$t_{\rm Ia}^\alpha$ with $\alpha$$\sim$$-$1. The derived DTD is in excellent agreement with a generic prediction of the double-degenerate scenario, giving strong support to this scenario. In the single-degenerate (SD) scenario, although predictions by simple analytic formulations have broad DTD shapes that are similar to the observation, DTD shapes calculated by more detailed binary population synthesis tend to have strong peaks at characteristic time scales, which do not fit the observation. This result thus indicates either that the SD channel is not the major contributor to SNe Ia in an old stellar population, or that an improvement of binary population synthesis theory is required. Various sources of systematic uncertainties were examined and tested, but our main conclusions were not affected significantly.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/pasj/60.6.1327

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 59 references

Cited by

See all 255

Metadata

Authors
Totani, T., Morokuma, T., Oda, T., Doi, M., & Yasuda, N.
Venue
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan
Published
2008-12-25
Volume
60
Issue
6
Pages
1327-1346
ISSN
  • 0004-6264 (ISSN-L)
  • 2053-051X
OpenAlex
W2061347162
Cited by
255
References
59
FWCI
11.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Delay Time Distribution Measurement of Type Ia Supernovae by the Subaru/XMM-Newton Deep Survey and Implications for the Progenitor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/pasj/60.6.1327
The paper
Totani, T., Morokuma, T., Oda, T., Doi, M., & Yasuda, N. (2008). Delay Time Distribution Measurement of Type Ia Supernovae by the Subaru/XMM-Newton Deep Survey and Implications for the Progenitor. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan. https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/60.6.1327

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.