The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Plague Historians in Lab Coats*
Abstract
In 1998 a team of French scientists published a study demonstrating that the epidemic of infectious disease that struck Marseille in 1720–2, widely held at the time and ever since to be plague, was indeed plague.1 Two years later, the same team made a similar claim about the so-called Black Death, which spread over Europe between 1347 and 1353.2 Articles of this sort by various authors have continued to come out almost annually since 2000, always of course in scientific journals, but usually with a follow-up version in the popular press recast for a general audience. Neither the technical nor the popular versions have been offering much in the way of context, for example by showing how any one of the studies might relate to those reported previously. Attentive readers could thus well wonder what is so important about proving that past episodes of what was thought to be plague turn out to have been caused by plague; and wonder, too, whether each new article is not just more déjà lu.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“by 2011 it was announced that the complete genome of Y. pestis, assembled from fourteenth-century remains, had been sequenced (Bos et al. 2011;Little 2011).”
From Taking "Pandemic" Seriously: Making the Black Death Global (2015) · cites this paper as Little 2011
Citations
Cited by
Taking "Pandemic" Seriously: Making the Black Death Global
Green, M. (2015) · The Medieval Globe · doi:10.17302/tmg.1-1.3 · Cited by 95
Epilogue: A Hypothesis on the East Asian Beginnings of the Yersinia pestis Polytomy
Hymes, R. (2015) · The Medieval Globe · doi:10.17302/tmg.1-1.11 · Cited by 18
Palumbo, A. (2017) · Medieval Worlds · doi:10.1553/medievalworlds_no6_2017s118 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Little, L. K.
- Venue
- Past & Present
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-11-01
- Volume
- 213
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 267-290
- ISSN
- 0031-2746
- 1477-464X
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review