Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 37

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Plague Historians in Lab Coats*

Little, L. K.·2011·Past & Present

Abstract

In 1998 a team of French scientists published a study demonstrating that the epidemic of infectious disease that struck Marseille in 1720–2, widely held at the time and ever since to be plague, was indeed plague.1 Two years later, the same team made a similar claim about the so-called Black Death, which spread over Europe between 1347 and 1353.2 Articles of this sort by various authors have continued to come out almost annually since 2000, always of course in scientific journals, but usually with a follow-up version in the popular press recast for a general audience. Neither the technical nor the popular versions have been offering much in the way of context, for example by showing how any one of the studies might relate to those reported previously. Attentive readers could thus well wonder what is so important about proving that past episodes of what was thought to be plague turn out to have been caused by plague; and wonder, too, whether each new article is not just more déjà lu.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/pastj/gtr014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Metadata

Authors
Little, L. K.
Venue
Past & Present
Published
2011-11-01
Volume
213
Issue
1
Pages
267-290
ISSN
  • 0031-2746
  • 1477-464X
Cited by
37
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review