The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Differences Between Rice and Wheat in Temperature Responses of Photosynthesis and Plant Growth
Open accessAbstract
The temperature responses of photosynthesis (A) and growth were examined in rice and wheat grown hydroponically under day/night temperature regimes of 13/10, 19/16, 25/19, 30/24 and 37/31 degrees C. Irrespective of growth temperature, the maximal rates of A were found to be at 30-35 degrees C in rice and at 25-30 degrees C in wheat. Below 25 degrees C the rates were higher in wheat, while above 30 degrees C they were higher in rice. However, in both species, A measured at the growth temperature remained almost constant irrespective of temperature. Biomass production and relative growth rate (RGR) were greatest in rice grown at 30/24 degrees C and in wheat grown at 25/19 degrees C. Although there was no difference between the species in the optimal temperature of the leaf area ratios (LARs), the net assimilation rate (NAR) in rice decreased at low temperature (19/16 degrees C) while the NAR in wheat decreased at high temperature (37/31 degrees C). For both species, the N-use efficiency (NUE) for growth rate (GR), estimated by dividing the NAR by leaf-N content, correlated with GR and with biomass production. Similarly, when NUE for A at growth temperature was estimated, the temperature response of NUE for A was similar to that of NUE for GR in both species. The results suggest that the difference between rice and wheat in the temperature response of biomass production depends on the difference in temperature dependence of NUE for A.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Makino, A., Nakano, H., & Mae, T. (1994) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.105.4.1231 · Cited by 119
Self-citation
Cited by
Dusenge, M. E., Duarte, A. G., & Way, D. A. (2019) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.15283 · Cited by 1,116
Photosynthesis, Grain Yield, and Nitrogen Utilization in Rice and Wheat
Makino, A. (2011) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.110.165076 · Cited by 548
Self-citationOptimizing Rubisco and its regulation for greater resource use efficiency
CARMO‐SILVA, E., SCALES, J. C., MADGWICK, P. J., & PARRY, M. A. J. (2015) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/pce.12425 · Cited by 338
The uncertainty of crop yield projections is reduced by improved temperature response functions
Wang, E., Martre, P., Zhao, Z., Ewert, F., Maiorano, A., Rötter, R. P., Kimball, B. A., Ottman, M. J., Wall, G. W., White, J. W., et al. (2017) · Nature Plants · doi:10.1038/nplants.2017.102 · Cited by 329
Cai, C., Yin, X., He, S., Jiang, W., Si, C., Struik, P. C., Luo, W., Li, G., Xie, Y., Xiong, Y., et al. (2016) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13065 · Cited by 278
Metadata
- Authors
- Nagai, T., & Makino, A.
- Venue
- Plant and Cell Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-02-27
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 744-755
- ISSN
- 0032-0781 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-9053
- OpenAlex
- W2118320318
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differences Between Rice and Wheat in Temperature Responses of Photosynthesis and Plant Growth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/pcp/pcp029
- The paper
- Nagai, T., & Makino, A. (2009). Differences Between Rice and Wheat in Temperature Responses of Photosynthesis and Plant Growth. Plant and Cell Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcp029
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.