The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Continuum of Primary Carbonatitic-Kimberlitic Melt Compositions in Equilibrium with Lherzolite: Data from the System CaO-MgO-Al2O3-SiO2-CO2 at 6 GPa
Abstract
The compositions of liquids in equilibrium with lherzolite over a range of temperatures (1380–1505°C) above the carbonated lherzolite solidus have been determined in the system CaO–MgO–Al2O3–SiO2–CO2 at 6 GPa. Melt compositions show systematic variation with temperature from carbonatitic (Mg/Ca ratio 1; 5 wt % SiO2) at the solidus (1380°C) through intermediary compositions to kimberlitic (Mg/Ca ratios >2; >25 wt % SiO2) 70–100°C above the solidus. For melting of model lherzolite with a CO2 content of 0.15 wt %, this continuous change in melt composition from carbonatitic to kimberlitic takes place in the melting range 0–1%. Our data are thus consistent with an origin for group 1B kimberlites by low-degree partial melting of carbonated, garnet lherzolite at pressures of at least <10 GPa. Furthermore, the observed carbonatite–kimberlite continuum in melt compositions supports petrogenetic links between carbonatites and kimberlites in the mantle source region by small variations in the melt fraction. Carbonatites are associated with kimberlites in mobile belts adjacent to cratons, such as in the Sarfartoq region in west Greenland. Here, a continuum of rock compositions that range from kimberlite through ultramafic lamprophyres to dolomitic carbonatites is in very good agreement with the experimental data at 6 GPa, consistent with the variations in magma compositions in the Sarfartoq region being produced mainly by variations in the amount of melting at the source. Our data suggest that a similar origin may apply to other carbonatite–kimberlite–ultramafic alkaline rock associations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Diamonds and the Geology of Mantle Carbon
Shirey, S. B., Cartigny, P., Frost, D. J., Keshav, S., Nestola, F., Nimis, P., Pearson, D. G., Sobolev, N. V., & Walter, M. J. (2013) · Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry · doi:10.2138/rmg.2013.75.12 · Cited by 451
Ambient and excess mantle temperatures, olivine thermometry, and active vs. passive upwelling
Putirka, K. D., Perfit, M., Ryerson, F. J., & Jackson, M. G. (2007) · Chemical Geology · doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2007.01.014 · Cited by 451
Rejuvenation and erosion of the cratonic lithosphere
Foley, S. F. (2008) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo261 · Cited by 390
LE ROEX, A. P., BELL, D. R., & DAVIS, P. (2003) · Journal of Petrology · doi:10.1093/petrology/egg077 · Cited by 377
TAPPE, S., FOLEY, S. F., JENNER, G. A., HEAMAN, L. M., KJARSGAARD, B. A., ROMER, R. L., STRACKE, A., JOYCE, N., & HOEFS, J. (2006) · Journal of Petrology · doi:10.1093/petrology/egl008 · Cited by 373
Metadata
- Authors
- Dalton, J. A., & Presnall, D. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Petrology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-11-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 11-12
- Pages
- 1953-1964
- ISSN
- 0022-3530 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2415
- OpenAlex
- W2010963002
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Continuum of Primary Carbonatitic-Kimberlitic Melt Compositions in Equilibrium with Lherzolite: Data from the System CaO-MgO-Al2O3-SiO2-CO2 at 6 GPa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/petroj/39.11-12.1953
- The paper
- Dalton, J. A., & Presnall, D. C. (1998). The Continuum of Primary Carbonatitic-Kimberlitic Melt Compositions in Equilibrium with Lherzolite: Data from the System CaO-MgO-Al2O3-SiO2-CO2 at 6 GPa. Journal of Petrology. https://doi.org/10.1093/petroj/39.11-12.1953
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.