The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Calculation of Peridotite Partial Melting from Thermodynamic Models of Minerals and Melts. I. Review of Methods and Comparison with Experiments
Abstract
Thermodynamic calculation of partial melting of peridotite using the MELTS algorithm has the potential to aid understanding of a wide range of problems related to mantle melting. We review the methodology of MELTS calculations with special emphasis on the features that are relevant for evaluating the suitability of this thermodynamic model for simulations of mantle melting. Comparison of MELTS calculations with well–characterized peridotite partial melting experiments allows detailed evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of the algorithm for application to peridotite melting problems. Calculated liquid compositions for partial melting of fertile and depleted peridotite show good agreement with experimental trends for all oxides; for some oxides the agreement between the calculated and experimental concentrations is almost perfect, whereas for others, the trends with melt fraction are comparable, but there is a systematic offset in absolute concentration. Of particular interest is the prediction by MELTS that at 1 GPa, near–solidus partial melts of fertile peridotite have markedly higher SiO2 than higher melt fraction liquids, but that at similar melt fractions, calculated partial melts of depleted peridotites are not SiO2 enriched. Similarly, MELTS calculations suggest that near–solidus partial melts of fertile peridotite, but not those of depleted peridotite, have less TiO2 than would be anticipated from higher temperature experiments. Because both experiments and calculations suggest that these unusual near–solidus melt compositions occur for fertile peridotite but not for depleted peridotite, it is highly unlikely that these effects are the consequence of experimental or model artifacts. Despite these successes of the results of calculations of peridotite melting using MELTS, there are a number of shortcomings to application of this thermodynamic model to calculations of mantle melting. In particular, calculated compositions of liquids produced by partial melting of peridotite have more MgO and less SiO2 than equivalent experimentally derived liquids. This mismatch, which is caused by overprediction of the stability of orthopyroxene relative to olivine, causes a number of other problems, including calculated temperatures of melting that are too high. Secondarily, the calculated distribution of Na between pyroxenes and liquid does not match experimentally observed values, which leads to exaggerated calculated Na concentrations for near–solidus partial melts of peridotite. Calculations of small increments of batch melting followed by melt removal predict that fractional melting is less productive than batch melting near the solidus, where the composition of the liquid is changing rapidly, but that once the composition of the liquid ceases to change rapidly, fractional and batch melting produce liquid at similar rates per increment of temperature increase until the exhaustion of clinopyroxene. This predicted effect is corroborated by sequential incremental batch melting experiments (Hirose & Kawamura, 1994, Geophysical Research Letters, 21, 2139–2142). For melting of peridotite in response to fluxing with water, the calculated effect is that melt fraction increases linearly with the amount of water added until exhaustion of clinopyroxene (cpx), at which point the proportion of melt created per increment of water added decreases. Between the solidus and exhaustion of cpx, the amount of melt generated per increment of water added increases with temperature. These trends are similar to those documented experimentally by Hirose & Kawamoto (1995, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 133, 463–473).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The volume and composition of melt generated by extension of the lithosphere
McKENZIE, D., & BICKLE, M. J. (1988) · Journal of Petrology · doi:10.1093/petrology/29.3.625 · Cited by 2,951 · cited 12×
“Advances in Earth and Planetary Sciences, New York: Dover, pp. 135–136.”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Cited by
Ghiorso, M. S., Hirschmann, M. M., Reiners, P. W., & Kress, V. C. (2002) · Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems · doi:10.1029/2001gc000217 · Cited by 891
Self-citationAdiabat_1ph: A new public front‐end to the MELTS, pMELTS, and pHMELTS models
Smith, P. M., & Asimow, P. D. (2005) · Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems · doi:10.1029/2004gc000816 · Cited by 558
Self-citationThe redox state of subduction zones: insights from arc-peridotites
Parkinson, I. J., & Arculus, R. J. (1999) · Chemical Geology · doi:10.1016/s0009-2541(99)00110-2 · Cited by 527
Near-solidus Melting of the Shallow Upper Mantle: Partial Melting Experiments on Depleted Peridotite
WASYLENKI, L. E. (2003) · Journal of Petrology · doi:10.1093/petrology/44.7.1163 · Cited by 287
Self-citationPlate tectonics and continental basaltic geochemistry throughout Earth history
Keller, B., & Schoene, B. (2018) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2017.10.031 · Cited by 173
Metadata
- Authors
- Hirschmann, M. M., Ghiorso, M. S., Wasylenki, L. E., Asimow, P. D., & Stolper, E. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Petrology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-06-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1091-1115
- ISSN
- 0022-3530 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2415
- OpenAlex
- W2111631319
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Calculation of Peridotite Partial Melting from Thermodynamic Models of Minerals and Melts. I. Review of Methods and Comparison with Experiments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/petroj/39.6.1091
- The paper
- Hirschmann, M. M., Ghiorso, M. S., Wasylenki, L. E., Asimow, P. D., & Stolper, E. M. (1998). Calculation of Peridotite Partial Melting from Thermodynamic Models of Minerals and Melts. I. Review of Methods and Comparison with Experiments. Journal of Petrology. https://doi.org/10.1093/petroj/39.6.1091
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.