Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 489

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hf-Nd Element and Isotope Perspective on the Nature and Provenance of Mantle and Subduction Components in Western Pacific Arc-Basin Systems

Open access
Pearce, J. A., Kempton, P. D., Nowell, G. M., Noble, S. R.·1999·Journal of Petrology

Abstract

This paper develops methods for using the integrated study of Hf-Nd element and isotope covariations to define the nature and provenance of the mantle and subduction inputs to subduction systems. In particular, it can be demonstrated that (1) Hf-Nd isotope space permits discrimination between mantle of Pacific and Indian provenance, (2) displacements from mantle arrays on Hf-Nd isotope and trace element projections can be related to the magnitude, source and composition of the subduction input, and (3) Hf-Nd isotope and trace element covariations can be used to interpret high field strength element (HFSE) anomalies [specifically, Hf anomalies on extended rare earth element (REE) patterns] in subduction-related magmas. These methods are tested using published volcanic arc data coupled with new data from the many components of the Izu-Bonin-Mariana (IBM) subduction system, namely the pre-subduction marginal basins, the Eocene to Recent volcanic arcs, and the crust, volcanogenic sediments and pelagic sediments of the subducting Pacific plate. The results of the IBM study show that the mantle that fed the IBM system was always of Indian provenance and that Pacific volcanogenic sediments make the most significant, though variable, contribution to the subduction component. Modelling demonstrates that the Nd/Hf ratio of the subduction component probably lay between 40 and infinity and thus was probably the main cause of the negative HFSE anomalies that characterize much of the Recent arc. This result may further indicate that the subducting sediment lost elements to the mantle wedge mostly by dehydration rather than fusion. In contrast, the data also show that the positive Hf anomalies that characterize much of the Protoarc cannot be attributed directly to subduction. One option consistent with Hf-Nd systematics is that the positive Hf anomalies in the Protoarc boninites were caused by fusion of mafic veins in their shallow mantle sources. Comparison with published data on other arcs shows significant inter-arc variations. For example, the subduction components in near-continent arcs (Banda, Lesser Antilles) appear to have lower Nd/Hf ratios more consistent with sediment fusion, and at least one arc (Tonga-Fiji) carries evidence of temporal variations in mantle provenance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/petroj/40.11.1579

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Metadata

Authors
Pearce, J. A., Kempton, P. D., Nowell, G. M., & Noble, S. R.
Venue
Journal of Petrology
Published
1999-11-01
Volume
40
Issue
11
Pages
1579-1611
ISSN
  • 0022-3530 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2415
OpenAlex
W2108095642
Cited by
489
References
2
FWCI
5.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hf-Nd Element and Isotope Perspective on the Nature and Provenance of Mantle and Subduction Components in Western Pacific Arc-Basin Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/petroj/40.11.1579
The paper
Pearce, J. A., Kempton, P. D., Nowell, G. M., & Noble, S. R. (1999). Hf-Nd Element and Isotope Perspective on the Nature and Provenance of Mantle and Subduction Components in Western Pacific Arc-Basin Systems. Journal of Petrology. https://doi.org/10.1093/petroj/40.11.1579

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.