Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 692

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Crystallization and Layering of the Skaergaard Intrusion

MCBIRNEY, A. R., NOYES, R. M.·1979·Journal of Petrology

Abstract

Solidification of large slowly cooled intrusions is a complex process entailing progressive changes of rheological properties as the crystallizing magma passes through successive stages between a viscous Newtonian fluid and a brittle solid rock. Studies of this transition in the Skaergaard intrusion indicate that most crystallization took place in an advancing front of solidification against the floor, walls, and roof where crystals nucleated and grew in a static boundary layer, much in the manner proposed by Jackson in 1961. The non-Newtonian properties of the crystallizing magma account for the fact that plagioclase, which was lighter than the liquid, is a major component of rocks on the floor, while mafic minerals that were heavier than the liquid accumulated under the roof. Crystals that nucleated and grew in these zones were trapped by an increasingly rigid zone that advanced more rapidly than the crystals sank or floated. If any crystals escaped entrapment, they were those of the largest size and density contrast. The rates of accumulation in different parts of the intrusion were not governed by rates of gravitational accumulation so much as by the nature of convection and heat transfer. Cumulate textures, preferred orientations of crystals, and layering, all of which have been taken as evidence of sedimentation, can be explained in terms of in situ crystallization. Layering cannot have been caused by density currents sweeping across the floor; it is well developed on the walls and under the roof, lacks the size and density grading and mineralogical compositions that would be expected, and shows no evidence of having been affected by obstructions in the paths of the currents. We propose an alternative origin of layering that is based on processes governed by the relative rates of chemical and thermal diffusion during cooling. Intermittent layering resulted from gravitational stratification of the liquid, and cyclic layering was produced by an oscillatory process of nucleation and crystal growth. The effects of differentiation during in situ crystallization are strongly dependent on relative rates of diffusion of individual components, and some of the compositional variations in different parts of the intrusion can be explained in terms of these differences.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/petrology/20.3.487

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 692

Metadata

Authors
MCBIRNEY, A. R., & NOYES, R. M.
Venue
Journal of Petrology
Published
1979-08-01
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
487-554
ISSN
  • 0022-3530 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2415
OpenAlex
W2332142389
Cited by
692
References
0
FWCI
21.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Crystallization and Layering of the Skaergaard Intrusion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/petrology/20.3.487
The paper
MCBIRNEY, A. R., & NOYES, R. M. (1979). Crystallization and Layering of the Skaergaard Intrusion. Journal of Petrology. https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/20.3.487

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.