The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Geothermobarometry in Four-phase Lherzolites II. New Thermobarometers, and Practical Assessment of Existing Thermobarometers
Abstract
On the basis of experiments presented in Part I of this series, most of the published thermobarometers relevant to four-phase peridotites are tested here for their ability to reproduce experimental conditions. They were rejected if any systematic discrepancy in either pressure or temperature was discernible. This test cautions against the use of all published versions of thermometers basad on the compositions of coexisting ortho- and clinopyroxenes and the use of existing barometers based on the Al content of orthopyroxene axxisting with garnet. Therefore, we formulated new versions of the two-pyroxene thermometer and the Al-in-opx barometer: with KD*=(1-Ca*)cpx/(1-Ca*)opx;Ca*=CaM2/(1-NaM2) and XFePx=Fe/Fe+Mg);TBKN is in degress Kelvin and P is in kilobars. Our new barometer is of the form (C1–C3) and site occupancies are given in the text. Temperatures may also be calculated from the Ca content of opx alone: This thermometer can be applied both to the CMS and the natural system experiments, which may indicate that Fe and Na have counter-balancing effects on the Ca content of opx. The partitioning of Na between opx and cpx can also serve as a useful thermometer, and was calibrated from natural rock data: where T is in degrees Kelvin, P is in kilobars, and DNa=Naopx/Nacpx. The following three published thermobarometers based on further exchange reactions are capable of reprducing experimental conditions: exchange of Ca between olivine and clinopyroxene as a barometer (PKB), exchange of Fe and Mg between garnet and clinopyroxene as a thermometer (TKrogh), exchange of Fe and Mg between garnet and olivine as a thermometer (TO'Neiii). Our tests also show that the most accurate pressure and temperature estimates arc obtained from the following combinations of thermometers and barometers: TBKN+PBKN, TBKN+PKB, TKrogh+PBKN, TO'Ne$$$ll+PBKN.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The elusive lithosphere–asthenosphere boundary (LAB) beneath cratons
Eaton, D. W., Darbyshire, F., Evans, R. L., Grütter, H., Jones, A. G., & Yuan, X. (2009) · Lithos · doi:10.1016/j.lithos.2008.05.009 · Cited by 438
Nature and origin of eclogite xenoliths from kimberlites
Jacob, D. E. (2004) · Lithos · doi:10.1016/j.lithos.2004.03.038 · Cited by 320
The continental lithosphere–asthenosphere boundary: Can we sample it?
O'Reilly, S. Y., & Griffin, W. L. (2010) · Lithos · doi:10.1016/j.lithos.2010.03.016 · Cited by 162
Adam, J., Rushmer, T., O'Neil, J., & Francis, D. (2012) · Geology · doi:10.1130/g32623.1 · Cited by 96
Sartini-Rideout, C., Gilotti, J. A., & Mc Clelland, W. C. (2010) · European Journal of Mineralogy · doi:10.1127/0935-1221/2009/0021-2002 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- BREY, G. P., & K HLER, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Petrology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1990-12-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1353-1378
- ISSN
- 0022-3530 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2415
- OpenAlex
- W2046141409
- Cited by
- 2,269
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Geothermobarometry in Four-phase Lherzolites II. New Thermobarometers, and Practical Assessment of Existing Thermobarometers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/petrology/31.6.1353
- The paper
- BREY, G. P., & K HLER, T. (1990). Geothermobarometry in Four-phase Lherzolites II. New Thermobarometers, and Practical Assessment of Existing Thermobarometers. Journal of Petrology. https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/31.6.1353
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.