The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Residence of REE, Y, Th and U in Granites and Crustal Protoliths; Implications for the Chemistry of Crustal Melts
Abstract
A systematic study with laser ablation—ICP-MS, scanning electron microscopy and electron microprobe revealed that ∼70–95 wt% of REE (except Eu), Y, Th and U in granite rocks and crustal protoliths reside within REEYThU-rich accessories whose nature, composition and associations change with the rock aluminosity. The accessory assemblage of peraluminous granites, migmatites and high-grade rocks is composed of monazite, xenotime (in low-Ca varieties), apatite, zircon, Thorthosilicate, uraninite and betafite-pyrochlore. Metaluminous granites have allanite, sphene, apatite, zircon, monazite and Thorthosilicaie. Peralkaline granites have aeschinite, fergusonite, samarskite, bastnaesite, fluocerite, allanite, sphene, zircon, monazite, xenotime and Th-orthosilicate. Granulite-grade garnets are enriched in Nd and Sm by no less than one order of magnitude with respect to amphibolite-grade garnets. Granulitegrade feldspars are also enriched in LREE with respect to amphibolite-grade feldspars. Accessories cause non-Henrian behaviour of REE, Y, Th and U during melt—solid partitioning. Because elevated fractions of monazite, xenotime and zircon in common migmatites are included within major minerals, their behaviour during anatexis is controlled by that of their host. Settling curves calculated for a convecting magma show that accessories are too small to settle appreciably, being separated from the melt as inclusions within larger minerals. Biotite has the greatest tendency to include accessories, thereby indirectly controlling the geochemistry of REE, Y, Th and U. We conclude that REE, Y, Th and U are unsuitable for petrogenetical modelling of granitoids through equilibrium-based trace-element fractionation equations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Harlov, D. E., Wirth, R., & Hetherington, C. J. (2011) · Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology · doi:10.1007/s00410-010-0599-7 · Cited by 391
Harlov, D. E., & Förster, H.-J. (2004) · American Mineralogist · doi:10.2138/am-2003-8-905 · Cited by 319
Kohn, M. J., & Malloy, M. A. (2004) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/s0016-7037(03)00258-8 · Cited by 294
Bédard, J. H., Brouillette, P., Madore, L., & Berclaz, A. (2003) · Precambrian Research · doi:10.1016/s0301-9268(03)00181-5 · Cited by 118
Europium anomalies in zircon: A signal of crustal depth?
Yakymchuk, C., Holder, R. M., Kendrick, J., & Moyen, J.-F. (2023) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2023.118405 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- BEA, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Petrology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 521-552
- ISSN
- 0022-3530 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2415
- OpenAlex
- W2098235917
- Cited by
- 1,010
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Residence of REE, Y, Th and U in Granites and Crustal Protoliths; Implications for the Chemistry of Crustal Melts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/petrology/37.3.521
- The paper
- BEA, F. (1996). Residence of REE, Y, Th and U in Granites and Crustal Protoliths; Implications for the Chemistry of Crustal Melts. Journal of Petrology. https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/37.3.521
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.