The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Venue-Based Method for Sampling Hard-to-Reach Populations
Open accessAbstract
Constructing scientifically sound samples of hard-to-reach populations, also known as hidden populations, is a challenge for many research projects. Traditional sample survey methods, such as random sampling from telephone or mailing lists, can yield low numbers of eligible respondents while non-probability sampling introduces unknown biases. The authors describe a venue-based application of time-space sampling (TSS) that addresses the challenges of accessing hard-to-reach populations. The method entails identifying days and times when the target population gathers at specific venues, constructing a sampling frame of venue, day-time units (VDTs), randomly selecting and visiting VDTs (the primary sampling units), and systematically intercepting and collecting information from consenting members of the target population. This allows researchers to construct a sample with known properties, make statistical inference to the larger population of venue visitors, and theorize about the introduction of biases that may limit generalization of results to the target population. The authors describe their use of TSS in the ongoing Community Intervention Trial for Youth (CITY) project to generate a systematic sample of young men who have sex with men. The project is an ongoing community level HIV prevention intervention trial funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The TSS method is reproducible and can be adapted to hard-to-reach populations in other situations, environments, and cultures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Social research 2.0: virtual snowball sampling method using Facebook
Baltar, F., & Brunet, I. (2012) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/10662241211199960 · Cited by 1,284
(2020) · doi:10.1542/peds.2020-007294 · Cited by 546
Considerations for employing intersectionality in qualitative health research
Abrams, J. A., Tabaac, A., Jung, S., & Else-Quest, N. M. (2020) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113138 · Cited by 319
Perceived Risks and Benefits of Sex Work among Transgender Women of Color in San Francisco
Sausa, L. A., Keatley, J., & Operario, D. (2007) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9210-3 · Cited by 263
Kendall, C., Kerr, L. R. F. S., Gondim, R. C., Werneck, G. L., Macena, R. H. M., Pontes, M. K., Johnston, L. G., Sabin, K., & McFarland, W. (2008) · AIDS and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10461-008-9390-4 · Cited by 263
Metadata
- Authors
- Muhib, F. B., Lin, L. S., Stueve, A., Miller, R. L., Ford, W. L., Johnson, W. D., Smith, P. J., & Community Intervention Trial for Youth Study Team
- Venue
- Public Health Reports®
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 1_suppl
- Pages
- 216-222
- ISSN
- 0033-3549 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2877
- OpenAlex
- W2056062595
- Cited by
- 569
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Venue-Based Method for Sampling Hard-to-Reach Populations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/phr/116.s1.216
- The paper
- Muhib, F. B., Lin, L. S., Stueve, A., Miller, R. L., Ford, W. L., Johnson, W. D., Smith, P. J., & Community Intervention Trial for Youth Study Team. (2001). A Venue-Based Method for Sampling Hard-to-Reach Populations. Public Health Reports®. https://doi.org/10.1093/phr/116.s1.216
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.