Condition, buoyancy and the distribution of larval fish: implications for vertical migration and retention
Abstract
A Lagrangian time-stepping model driven by water density, daytime larval feeding and swimming, and by condition-related larval buoyancy was used to track the vertical position and condition of individual larval cod ( Gadus morhua L.) in a stratified water column. The model results can explain the variety of frequencies, phases and amplitudes of vertical migration (including inverse vertical migrations and increased dispersion at night) observed in field studies. Vertical distributions and conditions of post-yolk-sac larvae, derived from the model during day and night, are also consistent with comparable field observations. When vertical shear is introduced into the model, a simple localized larval retention mechanism, directly related to feeding, condition and buoyancy, is revealed. The model results also demonstrate increased shear dispersion (dilution) of poor-condition larvae relative to good-condition larvae, and may be used to explain the relative paucity of observations of dying or dead larvae in the field, Virtually all of the model results are directly testable in the field and/or laboratory, and we show how the findings may be directly applicable to larvae possessing functional swim bladders and perhaps to freshwater and marine invertebrate zooplankton.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The authors find it unlikely that the vertical distributions of scombrids would simply be a result of passive dispersal due to differences in larval density and movement from physical processes.
“We find it unlikely that the vertical distributions of scombrids would simply be a result of passive dispersal due to differences in larval density and movement from physical processes (Sclafani et al. 1993;Boehlert and Mundy 1994;Hare et al. 2001).”
From A comparison of sampling methods for larvae of medium and large epipelagic fish species during spring SEAMAP ichthyoplankton surveys in the Gulf of Mexico (2014) · cites this paper as Sclafani et al. 1993
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Habtes, S., Muller‐Karger, F. E., Roffer, M. A., Lamkin, J. T., & Muhling, B. A. (2014) · Limnology and Oceanography: Methods · doi:10.4319/lom.2014.12.86 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sclafani, M., Taggart, C. T., & Thompson, K. R.
- Affiliations
- Fisheries and Oceans Canada (CA)
- ORCID
- Sclafani, Matthew
- Venue
- Journal of Plankton Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 413-435
- ISSN
- 0142-7873 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3774
- OpenAlex
- W2138345496
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 5.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Plankton Research (publishedVersion)
- ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst) (submittedVersion)
- Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Division of Ocean Sciences
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ichthyology and Marine Biology
- Keywords
- fish larvae, vertical migration, larval retention, buoyancy, larval condition, cod, Gadus morhua, Lagrangian particle tracking, stratified water column, vertical shear, larval feeding, swim bladder, zooplankton, larval dispersal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review