The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting harmful algal blooms: a case study with Dinophysis ovum in the Gulf of Mexico.
Abstract
Blooms of Dinophysis ovum and Mesodinium spp. have been observed in the Gulf of Mexico since 2007 using the Imaging FlowCytobot technology. Bloom dynamics of these two organisms in conjunction with ancillary environmental data for a 5-year period were analyzed to identify the conditions necessary for bloom initiation or presence with the goal of predicting future blooms of D. ovum. Using time-series analysis, we observed a positive time-lagged correlation between the two organisms in each year when both were present, which suggests that the presence of Mesodinium may be useful as a leading indicator for a D. ovum bloom. Although in some cases D. ovum and Mesodinium co-occurred, no strong predator–prey relationship was observed. We identified a narrow range of temperature and salinity that could be necessary for bloom initiation of D. ovum and Mesodinium in the Gulf of Mexico. Analysis of images over the time series revealed a wide range in the size of Mesodinium cells, which suggests that species other than M. rubrum may be present in the Gulf of Mexico. Based on the occurrence of a D. ovum bloom preceded by low abundances of Mesodinium, we suggest that D. ovum is able to utilize ciliates other than M. rubrum as prey. Our observations indicate that environmental conditions, as well as Mesodinium abundance and species composition, can affect initiation, presence or abundance of D. ovum and thus may help in the prediction of future blooms.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Using ecological patterns of Mesodinium rubrum blooms as predictive guidelines for Dinophysis ovum blooms has proven successful along the Texas coast.
“Using the ecological patterns of M. rubrum blooms as predictive guidelines for Dinophysis ovum blooms has proven successful along the Texas coast (Harred and Campbell, 2014).”
From Current and Future Remote Sensing of Harmful Algal Blooms in the Chesapeake Bay to Support the Shellfish Industry (2020) · cites this paper as Harred and Campbell, 2014
Citations
Cites
Yasumoto, T., Murata, M., Oshima, Y., Sano, M., Matsumoto, G. K., & Clardy, J. (1985) · Tetrahedron · doi:10.1016/s0040-4020(01)96469-5 · Cited by 643
Nishitani, G., Nagai, S., Baba, K., Kiyokawa, S., Kosaka, Y., Miyamura, K., Nishikawa, T., Sakurada, K., Shinada, A., & Kamiyama, T. (2010) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02566-09 · Cited by 38
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- Breiman, 2001, Random forests, Mach. Learn., 45, 5, 10.1023/A:1010933404324 · DOI · Paper page
- Campbell, 2010, First harmful Dinophysis (Dinophyceae, Dinophysiales) bloom in the U.S. is revealed by automated imaging flow cytometry, J. Phycol., 46, 66, 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2009.00791.x · DOI
- Crawford, 1989, Mesodinium rubrum—the phytoplankter that wasn't, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 58, 161, 10.3354/meps058161 · DOI
- Deeds, 2010, First U.S. report of shellfish harvesting closures due to confirmed okadaic acid in Texas Gulf coast oysters, Toxicon, 55, 1138, 10.1016/j.toxicon.2010.01.003 · DOI
- Diaz, 2013, Climate variability and oceanographic settings associated with interannual variability in the initiation of Dinophysis acuminata blooms, Mar. Drugs, 11, 2964, 10.3390/md11082964 · DOI
- Emery, 2001, Data Analysis Methods in Physical Oceanography
- Garcia-Cuetos, 2012, Studies on the genus Mesodinium II. Ultrastructural and molecular investigations of five marine species help clarifying the taxonomy, J. Eukaryot. Microbiol., 59, 374, 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00630.x · DOI
- Hallegraeff, 1988, The marine dinoflagellate genus Dinophysis (Dinophyceae)—photosynthetic, neritic and non-photosynthetic, oceanic species, Phycologia, 27, 25, 10.2216/i0031-8884-27-1-25.1 · DOI
- Hansen, 2013, Acquired phototrophy in Mesodinium and Dinophysis—a review of cellular organization, prey selectivity, nutrient uptake and bioenergetics, Harmful Algae, 28, 126, 10.1016/j.hal.2013.06.004 · DOI
- Henrichs, 2011, Phylogenetic analysis of Brachidinium capitatum (Dinophyceae) from the Gulf of Mexico indicates membership in the Kareniacae, J. Phycol., 47, 366, 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2011.00960.x · DOI
- Hetland, 2007, Convergent blooms of Karenia brevis along the Texas coast, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L19604, 10.1029/2007GL030474 · DOI
- Johnson, 2005, Role of feeding in growth and photophysiology of Myrionecta rubra, Aquat. Microb. Ecol., 39, 303, 10.3354/ame039303 · DOI
- Johnson, 2013, Seasonal dynamics of Mesodinium rubrum in Chesapeake Bay, J. Plankton Res., 35, 877, 10.1093/plankt/fbt028 · DOI · Paper page
- Kim, 2012, Dinophysis caudata (Dinophyceae) sequesters and retains plastids from the mixotrophic ciliate prey Mesodinium rubrum, J. Phycol., 48, 569, 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2012.01150.x · DOI
- Kim, 2008, Growth and grazing responses of the mixotrophic dinoflagellate Dinophysis acuminata as functions of light intensity and prey concentration, Aquat. Microb. Ecol., 51, 301, 10.3354/ame01203 · DOI
- Minnhagen, 2011, Active uptake of kleptoplastids by Dinophysis caudata from its ciliate prey Myrionecta rubra, Aquat. Microb. Ecol., 62, 99, 10.3354/ame01459 · DOI
- Montagnes, 2008, Factors controlling the abundance and size distribution of the phototrophic ciliate Myrionecta rubra in open waters of the North Atlantic, J. Eukaryot. Microbiol., 55, 457, 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2008.00344.x · DOI
- Myung, 2013, Sequestered plastids in Mesodinium rubrum are functionally active up to 80 days of phototrophic growth without cryptomonad prey, Harmful Algae, 27, 82, 10.1016/j.hal.2013.05.001 · DOI
- Nagai, 2008, Predation by the toxic dinoflagellate Dinophysis fortii on the ciliate Myrionecta rubra and observation of sequestration of ciliate chloroplasts, J. Phycol., 44, 909, 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2008.00544.x · DOI
- Nielsen, 2012, Effects of light and food availability on toxin production, growth and photosynthesis in Dinophysis acuminata, Mar. Ecol-Prog. Ser., 471, 37, 10.3354/meps10027 · DOI
- Nishitani, 2012, Multiple plastids collected by the dinoflagellate Dinophysis mitra through kleptoplastidy, Appl. Environ. Microb., 78, 813, 10.1128/AEM.06544-11 · DOI
- Nishitani, 2008, Successful cultivation of the toxic dinoflagellate Dinophysis caudata (Dinophyceae), Plankton Benthos Res., 3, 78, 10.3800/pbr.3.78 · DOI
- Ogle M. Physical mechanisms driving harmful algal blooms along the Texas coast 2012 College Station, TX Texas A&M University MS thesis
- Olson, 2007, A submersible imaging-in-flow instrument to analyze nano-and microplankton: imaging FlowCytobot, Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods, 5, 195, 10.4319/lom.2007.5.195 · DOI
- Park, 2006, First successful culture of the marine dinoflagellate Dinophysis acuminata, Aquat. Microb. Ecol., 45, 101, 10.3354/ame045101 · DOI
- Park, 2008, Plastid dynamics during survival of Dinophysis caudata without its ciliate prey, J. Phycol., 44, 1154, 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2008.00579.x · DOI
- Riisgaard, 2009, Role of food uptake for photosynthesis, growth and survival of the mixotrophic dinoflagellate Dinophysis acuminata, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 381, 51, 10.3354/meps07953 · DOI
- Sosik, 2007, Automated taxonomic classification of phytoplankton sampled with imaging-in-flow cytometry, Limnol. Oceanogr., 5, 204, 10.4319/lom.2007.5.204 · DOI
- Swanson, 2010, The 2008 Texas Dinophysis ovum bloom: distribution and toxicity, Harmful Algae, 9, 190, 10.1016/j.hal.2009.10.001 · DOI
- Thyng, 2013, Origins of Karenia brevis harmful algal blooms along the Texas coast, Limnol. Oceanogr Fluids Environ., 3, 269, 10.1215/21573689-2417719 · DOI
- Tong, 2010, Culture techniques and growth characteristics of Dinophysis acuminata and its prey, Chin. J. Oceanol. Limnol., 28, 1230, 10.1007/s00343-010-9960-y · DOI
- Velo Suarez, 2014, The growth season of Dinophysis acuminata in an upwelling system embayment: a conceptual model based on in situ measurements, Deep-Sea Res. II, 101, 141, 10.1016/j.dsr2.2013.03.033 · DOI
- Yih, 2013, The red-tide ciliate Mesodinium rubrum in Korean coastal waters, Harmful Algae, 30, S53, 10.1016/j.hal.2013.10.006 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wolny, J. L., Tomlinson, M. C., Schollaert Uz, S., Egerton, T. A., McKay, J. R., Meredith, A., Reece, K. S., Scott, G. P., & Stumpf, R. P. (2020) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2020.00337 · Cited by 80
“rubrum blooms as predictive guidelines for Dinophysis ovum blooms has proven successful along the Texas coast (Harred and Campbell, 2014).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Harred, L. B., & Campbell, L.
- Affiliations
- Texas A&M University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Campbell, Lisa
- ORCID
- Campbell, Lisa
- Venue
- Journal of Plankton Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-07-27
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1434-1445
- ISSN
- 0142-7873 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3774
- OpenAlex
- W2132603457
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 1.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Plankton Research (publishedVersion)
- OakTrust (Texas A&M University Libraries) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Texas Sea Grant, Texas A and M University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Marine Toxins and Detection Methods
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine Plankton and Biogeochemistry
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
- Keywords
- Mesodinium rubrum, harmful algal blooms, bloom prediction, bloom initiation, leading indicators, predator-prey interactions, cell size variation, Gulf of Mexico, time-lagged correlation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
