Cited by 30Pain Management and TreatmentPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsAnesthesia and Pain Management

The Effects of Long-Term Ketamine Treatment on Cognitive Function in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Preliminary Study

Open access

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This preliminary study aimed to investigate the effects of long-term frequent ketamine treatment on cognitive function in [AQ-A] CRPS patients. DESIGN: A total of 30 CRPS patients were divided into two groups based on both the duration and frequency of ketamine treatment; the long-term frequent ketamine treatment (LF) group (N = 14) and the Non-LF group (N = 16). Participants were asked to complete a questionnaire packet including demographic and clinical characteristics and potential variables affecting cognitive function. Then, they performed the neuropsychological test. RESULTS: Results indicated that the LF group performed significantly poorer than the Non-LF group on the digit span, digit symbol, Controlled Oral Word Association Test, and Trail Making Test, but not the Stroop task. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CRPS receiving long-term frequent ketamine treatment showed impairment in cognitive function (specifically executive function) compared with those who do not. These findings may have implications for clinical assessment and rehabilitation of cognitive function in CRPS patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/pm/pnv112

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cognitive deficits were only seen in the frequent user group in a small group of regional pain disorders versus less frequent users.

    “Cognitive deficits were also only seen in very frequent users (over four times weekly) in a study of chronic self-administered ketamine177 and the frequent user group in a small group of regional pain disorders178 versus people who used ketamine less often.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. 10.1016/j.pain.2006.09.008 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00110-E · DOI
  3. 10.1016/S0885-3924(00)00183-4 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.pain.2009.06.023 · DOI
  5. Sharanya, 2010, The use of sub-anesthetic intravenous ketamine and adjuvant dexmedetomidine when treating acute pain from CRPS, Pain Physician, 13, 365
  6. 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2007.00314.x · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.acn.2007.05.005 · DOI
  8. Ceber, 2006, Katamine may be the first choice for anesthesia in burn patients, J Burn Care Res, 5, 760, 10.1097/01.BCR.0000238091.41737.7C · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.ejpain.2011.03.008 · DOI
  10. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02394.x · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.biopha.2006.06.021 · DOI
  12. 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2000.9545759.x · DOI
  13. 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.96574910.x · DOI
  14. 10.1007/s00213-006-0572-3 · DOI
  15. 10.1111/bcp.12157 · DOI
  16. 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.1827 · DOI
  17. Spreen O Benton AL. Neurosensory Center Comprehensive Examination for Aphasia: Manual of instructions. Revised edition. Victoria, BC, Canada: Neuropsychology Laboratory, University of Victoria, 1977.
  18. 10.2466/pms.1958.8.3.271 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/0006-8993(94)91558-X · DOI
  20. Verma, 1996, NMDA receptor antagonists impair prefrontal cortex function as assessed via spatial delayed alternation performance in rats: Modulation by dopamine, J Neurosci, 16, 373, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-01-00373.1996 · DOI
  21. 10.3171/jns.2003.98.1.0175 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2011.01.002 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.02.001 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, M., Cho, S., & Lee, J.-H.
Affiliations
  • Chung-Ang University (KR)
  • Chungnam National University (KR)
Venue
Pain Medicine
Published
2016-02-27
Volume
17
Issue
8
Pages
1447-1451
ISSN
  • 1526-2375 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-4637
OpenAlex
W2324081848
Cited by
30
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pain Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation
  • National Research Foundation of Korea
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Pain Management
Keywords
complex regional pain syndrome, ketamine, cognitive function, executive function, neuropsychological assessment, treatment duration and frequency, digit span, Trail Making Test, Controlled Oral Word Association Test, Stroop task
MeSH terms
Adult, Analgesics, Cognition, Female, Humans, Ketamine, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Complex Regional Pain Syndromes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review