Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 176

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Beta-hairpins in proteins revisited: lessons for de novo design

Open access
Gunasekaran, K., Ramakrishnan, C., Balaram, P.·1997·Protein Engineering Design and Selection

Abstract

Beta-Hairpins with short connecting loops (1-5 residues) have been identified from a data set of 250 non-homologous, high resolution (< or =2.0 A) protein crystal structures. The conformational preferences of the loop segments have been analyzed with the specific aim of identifying frequently occurring motifs. Type I' and II' beta-turns were found to have a high propensity for occurrence in two residue loops. For three and four residue loops, the major conformational motif in the linking segments is alphaR-alphaR-alphaL (type I beta-turn followed by a residue in a left-handed helical conformation) and alphaR-alphaR-alphaR-alphaL (a pi-turn motif), respectively. The present larger data set confirms the high occurrences of these motifs which have been identified in earlier analyses. In addition to type I' and type II' beta-turns, several examples of type I beta-turn nucleated two residue loop hairpins, in spite of having an opposing sense of twist to that of type I' beta-turn, have also been observed. Examination of these frequently occurring motifs (flanked by extended conformation [beta]) in the data set reveals that the motifs beta-alphaR-alphaR-alphaL-beta and beta-type I'-beta have equal propensity and type II' indeed having highest propensity to nucleate beta-hairpins. The larger number of examples in this study allows the estimation of the specific amino acid preferences for loop positions in two, three and four residue loops. Small polar residues Asn, Asp, Ser, Thr, Gly and Pro in general have a high propensity for the loop positions but they reveal specific positional preferences in these frequently occurring motifs. There are no strong compositional preferences in the strand segments. Amino acid pair correlations across strands also do not show any significant pattern, with the exception of Cys-Cys pairs. Several Cys-Cys pairs have been identified at the non-hydrogen bonded positions of beta-hairpins; as many as six are disulfide bonded pairs. An examination of longer loop length hairpins reveals that the distortions of hairpins nucleated by tight turns (two residues) are much less frequently observed. The results presented in this study provide inputs for the de novo design of consensus loop segments in synthetic hairpins.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/protein/10.10.1131

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 176

Metadata

Authors
Gunasekaran, K., Ramakrishnan, C., & Balaram, P.
Venue
Protein Engineering Design and Selection
Published
1997-10-01
Volume
10
Issue
10
Pages
1131-1141
ISSN
  • 0269-2139 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-0126
  • 1741-0134
OpenAlex
W2149449280
Cited by
176
References
0
FWCI
3.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Beta-hairpins in proteins revisited: lessons for de novo design. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/protein/10.10.1131
The paper
Gunasekaran, K., Ramakrishnan, C., & Balaram, P. (1997). Beta-hairpins in proteins revisited: lessons for de novo design. Protein Engineering Design and Selection. https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/10.10.1131

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.