Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 199

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Antibody affinity maturation using bacterial surface display

Daugherty, P. S., Chen, G., Olsen, M. J., Iverson, B. L., Georgiou, G.·1998·Protein Engineering Design and Selection

Abstract

A quantitative system for screening combinatorial single-chain Fv (scFv) antibody libraries was developed utilizing surface display on Escherichia coli and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). This system was employed to isolate clones with high-affinity to a fluorescently-labeled hapten from libraries constructed by randomizing heavy and light-chain residues in the anti-digoxin 26-10 derived antibody, scFv(dig). The use of flow cytometry enabled the detection of rare library members directly in heterogeneous populations and the optimization of selection conditions prior to sorting. A heavy-chain mutant having wild-type affinity (KD = 0.91+/-0.22 nM) and an expected representation frequency of less than 1 x 10(6), was selected to homogeneity after three rounds utilizing increasingly stringent selection conditions. The isolated clone possessed two distinct point mutations relative to the wild-type DNA sequence, yet still coded for the wild-type amino acid sequence, suggesting that the wild-type residues may be optimal at the randomized positions. An affinity improved clone (KD = 0.30+/-0.05 nM), having a dissociation constant approximately threefold lower than the wild-type antibody, was isolated from a smaller light-chain library in a single sorting step. Flow cytometry was shown to be a simple and rapid method for the determination of the relative hapten dissociation rate constants of selected clones without requiring subcloning. The relative rate constants estimated by FACS were confirmed by producing the scFv antibodies in soluble form and measuring hapten binding kinetics by surface plasmon resonance (SPR). These results demonstrate that E.coli surface display, coupled with quantitative selection and analysis using FACS, has the potential to become a powerful tool for rapid isolation and characterization of desirable mutants from large polypeptide libraries.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/protein/11.9.825

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 199

Metadata

Authors
Daugherty, P. S., Chen, G., Olsen, M. J., Iverson, B. L., & Georgiou, G.
Venue
Protein Engineering Design and Selection
Published
1998-09-01
Volume
11
Issue
9
Pages
825-832
ISSN
  • 0269-2139 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-0126
  • 1741-0134
OpenAlex
W2100717755
Cited by
199
References
0
FWCI
12.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antibody affinity maturation using bacterial surface display. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/protein/11.9.825
The paper
Daugherty, P. S., Chen, G., Olsen, M. J., Iverson, B. L., & Georgiou, G. (1998). Antibody affinity maturation using bacterial surface display. Protein Engineering Design and Selection. https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/11.9.825

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.