The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Machine learning approaches for the prediction of signal peptides and other protein sorting signals
Abstract
Prediction of protein sorting signals from the sequence of amino acids has great importance in the field of proteomics today. Recently, the growth of protein databases, combined with machine learning approaches, such as neural networks and hidden Markov models, have made it possible to achieve a level of reliability where practical use in, for example automatic database annotation is feasible. In this review, we concentrate on the present status and future perspectives of SignalP, our neural network-based method for prediction of the most well-known sorting signal: the secretory signal peptide. We discuss the problems associated with the use of SignalP on genomic sequences, showing that signal peptide prediction will improve further if integrated with predictions of start codons and transmembrane helices. As a step towards this goal, a hidden Markov model version of SignalP has been developed, making it possible to discriminate between cleaved signal peptides and uncleaved signal anchors. Furthermore, we show how SignalP can be used to characterize putative signal peptides from an archaeon, Methanococcus jannaschii. Finally, we briefly review a few methods for predicting other protein sorting signals and discuss the future of protein sorting prediction in general.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme
Matthews, B. W. (1975) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Protein Structure · doi:10.1016/0005-2795(75)90109-9 · Cited by 5,399
Cited by
Support vector machine approach for protein subcellular localization prediction
Hua, S., & Sun, Z. (2001) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.721 · Cited by 854
Proteome Map of the Chloroplast Lumen of Arabidopsis thaliana
Schubert, M., Petersson, U. A., Haas, B. J., Funk, C., Schröder, W. P., & Kieselbach, T. (2002) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m108575200 · Cited by 438
Unique amino acid composition of proteins in halophilic bacteria
Fukuchi, S., Yoshimune, K., Wakayama, M., Moriguchi, M., & Nishikawa, K. (2003) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(03)00150-5 · Cited by 277
Using subsite coupling to predict signal peptides
Chou, K.-C. (2001) · Protein Engineering, Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/14.2.75 · Cited by 255
A Novel Cytokine Receptor-Ligand Pair
Shi, Y., Ullrich, S. J., Zhang, J., Connolly, K., Grzegorzewski, K. J., Barber, M. C., Wang, W., Wathen, K., Hodge, V., Fisher, C. L., et al. (2000) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m910228199 · Cited by 232
Metadata
- Authors
- Nielsen, H., Brunak, S., & von Heijne, G.
- Venue
- Protein Engineering, Design and Selection
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-9
- ISSN
- 0269-2139 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-0134
- 1741-0126
- OpenAlex
- W2119452210
- Cited by
- 608
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Machine learning approaches for the prediction of signal peptides and other protein sorting signals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/protein/12.1.3
- The paper
- Nielsen, H., Brunak, S., & von Heijne, G. (1999). Machine learning approaches for the prediction of signal peptides and other protein sorting signals. Protein Engineering, Design and Selection. https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/12.1.3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.