The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Protein secondary structure prediction using logic-based machine learning
Abstract
Many attempts have been made to solve the problem of predicting protein secondary structure from the primary sequence but the best performance results are still disappointing. In this paper, the use of a machine learning algorithm which allows relational descriptions is shown to lead to improved performance. The Inductive Logic Programming computer program, Golem, was applied to learning secondary structure prediction rules for alpha/alpha domain type proteins. The input to the program consisted of 12 non-homologous proteins (1612 residues) of known structure, together with a background knowledge describing the chemical and physical properties of the residues. Golem learned a small set of rules that predict which residues are part of the alpha-helices--based on their positional relationships and chemical and physical properties. The rules were tested on four independent non-homologous proteins (416 residues) giving an accuracy of 81% (+/- 2%). This is an improvement, on identical data, over the previously reported result of 73% by King and Sternberg (1990, J. Mol. Biol., 216, 441-457) using the machine learning program PROMIS, and of 72% using the standard Garnier-Osguthorpe-Robson method. The best previously reported result in the literature for the alpha/alpha domain type is 76%, achieved using a neural net approach. Machine learning also has the advantage over neural network and statistical methods in producing more understandable results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Inductive Logic Programming: Theory and methods
Muggleton, S., & de Raedt, L. (1994) · The Journal of Logic Programming · doi:10.1016/0743-1066(94)90035-3 · Cited by 1,537
Self-citationCombining evolutionary information and neural networks to predict protein secondary structure
Rost, B., & Sander, C. (1994) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.340190108 · Cited by 1,452
Muggleton, S. (1995) · New Generation Computing · doi:10.1007/bf03037227 · Cited by 1,411
Self-citationArtificial Intelligence: A New Synthesis
(1998) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-27773-7 · Cited by 1,163
Knowledge-based artificial neural networks
Towell, G. G., & Shavlik, J. W. (1994) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(94)90105-8 · Cited by 746
Metadata
- Authors
- Muggleton, S., King, R. D., & Stenberg, M. J. E.
- Venue
- "Protein Engineering, Design and Selection"
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 647-657
- ISSN
- 0269-2139 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-0126
- 1741-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2162061564
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Protein secondary structure prediction using logic-based machine learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/protein/5.7.647
- The paper
- Muggleton, S., King, R. D., & Stenberg, M. J. E. (1992). Protein secondary structure prediction using logic-based machine learning. "Protein Engineering, Design and Selection". https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/5.7.647
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.