The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The protein threading problem with sequence amino acid interaction preferences is NP-complete
Abstract
In recent protein structure prediction research there has been a great deal of interest in using amino acid interaction preferences (e.g. contact potentials or potentials of mean force) to align ('thread') a protein sequence to a known structural motif. An important open question is whether a polynomial time algorithm for finding the globally optimal threading is possible. We identify the two critical conditions governing this question: (i) variable-length gaps are admitted into the alignment, and (ii) interactions between amino acids from the sequence are admitted into the score function. We prove that if both these conditions are allowed then the protein threading decision problem (does there exist a threading with a score < or = K?) is NP-complete (in the strong sense, i.e. is not merely a number problem) and the related problem of finding the globally optimal protein threading is NP-hard. Therefore, no polynomial time algorithm is possible (unless P = NP). This result augments existing proofs that the direct protein folding problem is NP-complete by providing the corresponding proof for the 'inverse' protein folding problem. It provides a theoretical basis for understanding algorithms currently in use and indicates that computational strategies from other NP-complete problems may be useful for predictive algorithms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score
Zhang, Y. (2005) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki524 · Cited by 3,774
Interactive machine learning for health informatics: when do we need the human-in-the-loop?
Holzinger, A. (2016) · Brain Informatics · doi:10.1007/s40708-016-0042-6 · Cited by 906
Protein Folding in the Hydrophobic-Hydrophilic ( HP ) Model is NP-Complete
BERGER, B., & LEIGHTON, T. (1998) · Journal of Computational Biology · doi:10.1089/cmb.1998.5.27 · Cited by 420
From Machine Learning to Explainable AI
Holzinger, A. (2018) · 2018 World Symposium on Digital Intelligence for Systems and Machines (DISA) · doi:10.1109/disa.2018.8490530 · Cited by 306
On the origin and highly likely completeness of single-domain protein structures
Zhang, Y., Hubner, I. A., Arakaki, A. K., Shakhnovich, E., & Skolnick, J. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0509379103 · Cited by 197
Metadata
- Authors
- Lathrop, R. H.
- Venue
- "Protein Engineering, Design and Selection"
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1059-1068
- ISSN
- 0269-2139 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-0126
- 1741-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2133715954
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The protein threading problem with sequence amino acid interaction preferences is NP-complete. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/protein/7.9.1059
- The paper
- Lathrop, R. H. (1994). The protein threading problem with sequence amino acid interaction preferences is NP-complete. "Protein Engineering, Design and Selection". https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/7.9.1059
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.