The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A combinatorial library of an α-helical bacterial receptor domain
Abstract
The construction and characterization of a combinatorial library of a solvent-exposed surface of an alpha-helical domain derived from a bacterial receptor is described. Using a novel solid-phase approach, the library was assembled in a directed and successive manner utilizing single-stranded oligonucleotides containing multiple random substitutions for the variegated segments of the gene fragment. The simultaneous substitution of 13 residues to all 20 possible amino acids was carried out in a region spanning 81 nucleotides. The randomization was made in codons for amino acids that were modelled to be solvent accessible at a surface made up from two of the three alpha-helices of a monovalent Fc-binding domain of staphylococcal protein A. After cloning of the PCR-amplified library into a phagemid vector adapted for phage display of the mutants, DNA sequencing analysis suggested a random distribution of codons in the mutagenized positions. Four members of the library with multiple substitutions were produced in Escherichia coli as fusions to an albumin-binding affinity tag derived from streptococcal protein G. The fusion proteins were purified by human serum albumin affinity chromatography and subsequently characterized by SDS-electrophoresis, CD spectroscopy and biosensor analysis. The analyses showed that the mutant protein A derivatives could all be secreted as soluble full-length proteins. Furthermore, the CD analysis showed that all mutants, except one with a proline introduced into helix 2, have secondary structures in close agreement with the wild-type domain. These results proved that members of this alpha-helical receptor library with multiple substitutions in the solvent-exposed surface remain stable and soluble in E. coli.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Proteomics: the first decade and beyond
Patterson, S. D., & Aebersold, R. H. (2003) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1106 · Cited by 745
Engineering novel binding proteins from nonimmunoglobulin domains
Binz, H. K., Amstutz, P., & Plückthun, A. (2005) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1127 · Cited by 676
Antibody phage display technology and its applications
Hoogenboom, H. R., de Bruı̈ne, A. P., Hufton, S. E., Hoet, R. M., Arends, J.-W., & Roovers, R. C. (1998) · Immunotechnology · doi:10.1016/s1380-2933(98)00007-4 · Cited by 512
Biosensor technology: Technology push versus market pull
Luong, J. H. T., Male, K. B., & Glennon, J. D. (2008) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.05.007 · Cited by 454
Affibody Molecules in Biotechnological and Medical Applications
Ståhl, S., Gräslund, T., Eriksson Karlström, A., Frejd, F. Y., Nygren, P.-Å., & Löfblom, J. (2017) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.04.007 · Cited by 382
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Nord, K., Nilsson, J., Nilsson, B., Uhlén, M., & Nygren, P.-Å.
- Venue
- "Protein Engineering, Design and Selection"
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 601-608
- ISSN
- 0269-2139 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-0126
- 1741-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2012536704
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A combinatorial library of an α-helical bacterial receptor domain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/protein/8.6.601
- The paper
- Nord, K., Nilsson, J., Nilsson, B., Uhlén, M., & Nygren, P.-Å. (1995). A combinatorial library of an α-helical bacterial receptor domain. "Protein Engineering, Design and Selection". https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/8.6.601
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.