Cited by 42Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchProtein purification and stabilityBiochemical and Structural Characterization

Towards a universal disulphide stabilised single chain Fv format: Importance of interchain disulphide bond location and vL-vH orientation

Weatherill, E. E., Cain, K. L., Heywood, S. P., Compson, J. E., Heads, J. T., Adams, R., Humphreys, D. P.·2012·Protein Engineering Design and Selection

Abstract

Engineered introduction of interface interchain disulphide bonds is perceived to be a simple method to increase the stability of single chain Fv (scFv). Six disulphide bond locations have been cited within the literature but the potential for the broad use of each has not been examined. Five of these disulphide bond locations were introduced into one scFv in order to compare their relative effects on expression, thermal stability, percent monomer formation and retention of antigen binding. The disulphide bond position vH44-vL100 was observed to enable the most favourable balance of biophysical properties. The vH44-vL100 disulphide bond was introduced into five additional scFv in both vL-vH and vH-vL orientations in order to investigate its general applicability. Data are presented to show the relative influence of scFv sequence, v-region organisation and interchain disulphide bond on expression yield, thermal stability and percent monomer. Introduction of the vH44-vL100 disulphide bond typically resulted in no or little increase in thermal stability and no change in percent monomer but did confer the benefit of permanently fixing monomer:dimer ratios during purification and analysis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/protein/gzs021

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weatherill, E. E., Cain, K. L., Heywood, S. P., Compson, J. E., Heads, J. T., Adams, R., & Humphreys, D. P.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Protein Engineering Design and Selection
Published
2012-05-14
Volume
25
Issue
7
Pages
321-329
ISSN
  • 0269-2139 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-0126
  • 1741-0134
OpenAlex
W2154404562
Cited by
42
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4
FWCI
2.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Protein Engineering Design and Selection (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein purification and stability
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Structural Characterization
Keywords
scFv, thermal stability, monomer formation, antigen binding, expression yield, antibody fragments
MeSH terms
Animals, Antibody Affinity, Antigens, Disulfides, Humans, Immunoglobulin Heavy Chains, Immunoglobulin Light Chains, Models, Molecular, Plasmids, Transfection, Protein Engineering, Protein Multimerization, Protein Stability, Single-Chain Antibodies, HEK293 Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review