The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computationally designed libraries for rapid enzyme stabilization
Open accessAbstract
The ability to engineer enzymes and other proteins to any desired stability would have wide-ranging applications. Here, we demonstrate that computational design of a library with chemically diverse stabilizing mutations allows the engineering of drastically stabilized and fully functional variants of the mesostable enzyme limonene epoxide hydrolase. First, point mutations were selected if they significantly improved the predicted free energy of protein folding. Disulfide bonds were designed using sampling of backbone conformational space, which tripled the number of experimentally stabilizing disulfide bridges. Next, orthogonal in silico screening steps were used to remove chemically unreasonable mutations and mutations that are predicted to increase protein flexibility. The resulting library of 64 variants was experimentally screened, which revealed 21 (pairs of) stabilizing mutations located both in relatively rigid and in flexible areas of the enzyme. Finally, combining 10-12 of these confirmed mutations resulted in multi-site mutants with an increase in apparent melting temperature from 50 to 85°C, enhanced catalytic activity, preserved regioselectivity and a >250-fold longer half-life. The developed Framework for Rapid Enzyme Stabilization by Computational libraries (FRESCO) requires far less screening than conventional directed evolution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Guerois, R., Nielsen, J. E., & Serrano, L. (2002) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00442-4 · Cited by 1,728 · cited 14×
“When using FoldX calculations only, a large fraction of the mutations predicted to be stabilizing appeared to be destabilizing or neutral when tested experimentally.”
BackgroundInfluentialDirected evolution drives the next generation of biocatalysts
Turner, N. J. (2009) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.203 · Cited by 785
Cited by
Methods for the directed evolution of proteins
Packer, M. S., & Liu, D. R. (2015) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3927 · Cited by 991
Cui, Y., Chen, Y., Liu, X., Dong, S., Tian, Y., Qiao, Y., Mitra, R., Han, J., Li, C., Han, X., et al. (2021) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.0c05126 · Cited by 580
Chemistry and Enzymology of Disulfide Cross-Linking in Proteins
Fass, D., & Thorpe, C. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00123 · Cited by 321
Porebski, B. T., & Buckle, A. M. (2016) · Protein Engineering Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/gzw015 · Cited by 215
Use of the SHuffle strains in production of proteins
Ren, G., Ke, N., & Berkmen, M. (2016) · Current Protocols in Protein Science · doi:10.1002/cpps.11 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Wijma, H. J., Floor, R. J., Jekel, P. A., Baker, D., Marrink, S. J., & Janssen, D. B.
- Venue
- Protein Engineering Design and Selection
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-01-08
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 49-58
- ISSN
- 0269-2139 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-0126
- 1741-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2171002584
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computationally designed libraries for rapid enzyme stabilization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/protein/gzt061
- The paper
- Wijma, H. J., Floor, R. J., Jekel, P. A., Baker, D., Marrink, S. J., & Janssen, D. B. (2014). Computationally designed libraries for rapid enzyme stabilization. Protein Engineering Design and Selection. https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/gzt061
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.