The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of Gait of Young Women and Elderly Women
Abstract
The purpose of our study was to describe and compare free-speed gait patterns of healthy young women with healthy elderly women. The evaluation was completed with high-speed cinematography using synchronized front and side views of 26 healthy volunteers. One group was composed of 13 subjects 20 to 35 years of age, and the other group was composed of 13 subjects 60 to 84 years of age. Each subject participated in one test session consisting of three filmed trials of free-speed ambulation down a 14-m walkway. The processed film was analyzed for 10 gait characteristics. Differences in gait characteristics between the two groups were examined using a correlated t test (p < .01). The elderly women demonstrated significantly smaller values of step length, stride length, ankle range of motion, pelvic obliquity, and velocity when compared with the younger women. The results of our study suggest that the physical therapist should not establish similar expectations for young women and elderly women during gait rehabilitation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Steffen, T. M., Hacker, T. A., & Mollinger, L. (2002) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/82.2.128 · Cited by 2,070
Balance disorders in the elderly
L. Sturnieks, D., St George, R., & R. Lord, S. (2008) · Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.neucli.2008.09.001 · Cited by 676
Step Length Reductions in Advanced Age: The Role of Ankle and Hip Kinetics
JudgeRoy, J. O., Davis, B., & Ounpuu, S. (1996) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences · doi:10.1093/gerona/51a.6.m303 · Cited by 585
Prince, F., Corriveau, H., Hébert, R., & Winter, D. A. (1997) · Gait & Posture · doi:10.1016/s0966-6362(97)01118-1 · Cited by 405
Daley, M. J., & Spinks, W. L. (2000) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/00007256-200029010-00001 · Cited by 366
Metadata
- Authors
- Hageman, P. A., & Blanke, D. J.
- Venue
- Physical Therapy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1986-09-01
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1382-1387
- ISSN
- 0031-9023 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-6724
- OpenAlex
- W4240807866
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Gait of Young Women and Elderly Women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ptj/66.9.1382
- The paper
- Hageman, P. A., & Blanke, D. J. (1986). Comparison of Gait of Young Women and Elderly Women. Physical Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/66.9.1382
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
