The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quadriceps Femoris Muscle Angle: Normal Values and Relationships with Gender and Selected Skeletal Measures
Abstract
The quadriceps femoris angle ("Q angle") has been implicated as a source of several knee disorders, but values for normal knees have not been adequately documented in the literature. This study was designed to provide clinicians with normal values and information regarding the relationships between Q angle, gender, and selected anatomical measurements. The Q angles of 100 individuals (50 men, 50 women), who had no history of knee disorders, were measured goniometrically. The hip widths and femur lengths of all subjects were measured with calipers. The mean Q angle for women was 15.8 +/- 4.5 degrees and for men was 11.2 +/- 3.0 degrees. Using a point biserial correlation, we found a relationship between gender and Q angle (r = -.517) that remained significant (p less than .01) when the effects of femur length and hip width were controlled. The relationships identified between Q angle and the anatomical measurements were no longer significant when the effect of gender was eliminated. The results substantiate the belief that women have larger Q angles than men, but they fail to provide clinicians with an anatomical explanation or new predictor of Q angle.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 24,532
Cited by
Willson, J. D., & Davis, I. S. (2008) · Clinical Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.08.025 · Cited by 386
Giugliano, D. N., & Solomon, J. L. (2007) · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.pmr.2007.05.002 · Cited by 77
Gamada, K. (2014) · International Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation · doi:10.4172/2329-9096.1000246 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Horton, M. G., & Hall, T. L.
- Venue
- Physical Therapy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1989-11-01
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 897-901
- ISSN
- 0031-9023 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-6724
- OpenAlex
- W2159379142
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.