The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Role of Limb Movements in Maintaining Upright Stance: The “Change-in-Support” Strategy
Abstract
Change-in-support strategies, involving stepping or grasping movements of the limbs, are prevalent reactions to instability and appear to play a more important functional role in maintaining upright stance than has generally been appreciated. Contrary to traditional views, change-in-support reactions are not just strategies of last resort, but are often initiated well before the center of mass is near the stability limits of the base of support. Furthermore, it appears that subjects, when given the option, will select these reactions in preference to the fixed-support "hip strategy" that has been purported to be of functional importance. The rapid speed of compensatory change-in-support reactions distinguishes them from "volitional" arm and leg movements. In addition, compensatory stepping reactions often lack the anticipatory control elements that are invariably present in non-compensatory stepping, such as gait initiation. Even when present, these anticipatory adjustments appear to have little functional value during rapid compensatory movements. Lateral destabilization complicates the control of compensatory stepping, a finding that may be particularly relevant to the problem of falls and hip fractures in elderly people. Older adults appear to have problems in controlling lateral stability when stepping to recover balance, even when responding to anteroposterior perturbation. Increased understanding and awareness of change-in-support reactions should lead to development of new diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for detecting and treating specific causes of imbalance and falling in elderly people and in patients with balance impairments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) to Differentiate Balance Deficits
Horak, F. B., Wrisley, D. M., & Frank, J. (2009) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.2522/ptj.20080071 · Cited by 1,062
A review of standing balance recovery from stroke
Geurts, A. C. H., de Haart, M., van Nes, I. J. W., & Duysens, J. (2005) · Gait & Posture · doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.10.002 · Cited by 474
Perry, S. D., McIlroy, W. E., & Maki, B. E. (2000) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0006-8993(00)02712-8 · Cited by 396
Self-citationThe Effect of a Cognitive Task on Voluntary Step Execution in Healthy Elderly and Young Individuals
Melzer, I., & Oddsson, L. I. E. (2004) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52353.x · Cited by 168
Relations of Balance Function and Gross Motor Ability for Children with Cerebral Palsy
Liao, H.-F., & Hwang, A.-W. (2003) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.2003.96.3c.1173 · Cited by 97
Metadata
- Authors
- Maki, B. E., & McIlroy, W. E.
- Venue
- Physical Therapy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-05-01
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 488-507
- ISSN
- 0031-9023 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-6724
- OpenAlex
- W2136771840
- Cited by
- 711
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Role of Limb Movements in Maintaining Upright Stance: The “Change-in-Support” Strategy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ptj/77.5.488
- The paper
- Maki, B. E., & McIlroy, W. E. (1997). The Role of Limb Movements in Maintaining Upright Stance: The “Change-in-Support” Strategy. Physical Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/77.5.488
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.