The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting the Probability for Falls in Community-Dwelling Older Adults
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The objective of this retrospective case-control study was to develop a model for predicting the likelihood of falls among community-dwelling older adults. SUBJECTS: Forty-four community-dwelling adults (> or = 65 years of age) with and without a history of falls participated. METHODS: Subjects completed a health status questionnaire and underwent a clinical evaluation of balance and mobility function. Variables that differed between fallers and nonfallers were identified, using t tests and cross tabulation with chi-square tests. A forward stepwise regression analysis was carried out to identify a combination of variables that effectively predicted fall status. RESULTS: Five variables were found to be associated with fall history. These variables were analyzed using logistic regression. The final model combined the score on the Berg Balance Scale with a self-reported history of imbalance to predict fall risk. Sensitivity was 91%, and specificity was 82%. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: A simple predictive model based on two risk factors can be used by physical therapists to quantify fall risk in community-dwelling older adults. Identification of patients with a high fall risk can lead to an appropriate referral into a fall prevention program. In addition, fall risk can be used to calculate change resulting from intervention.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Guralnik, J. M., Simonsick, E. M., Ferrucci, L., Glynn, R. J., Berkman, L. F., Blazer, D. G., Scherr, P. A., & Wallace, R. B. (1994) · Journal of Gerontology · doi:10.1093/geronj/49.2.m85 · Cited by 9,792
Cited by
Steffen, T. M., Hacker, T. A., & Mollinger, L. (2002) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/82.2.128 · Cited by 2,070
Using psychometric techniques to improve the Balance Evaluation Systems Test: the mini-BESTest
Franchignoni, F., Horak, F., Godi, M., Nardone, A., & Giordano, A. (2010) · Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.2340/16501977-0537 · Cited by 1,081
The Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) to Differentiate Balance Deficits
Horak, F. B., Wrisley, D. M., & Frank, J. (2009) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.2522/ptj.20080071 · Cited by 1,062
A clinical test of stepping and change of direction to identify multiple falling older adults
Dite, W., & Temple, V. A. (2002) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1053/apmr.2002.35469 · Cited by 788
Timed up and go test and risk of falls in older adults: A systematic review
Beauchet, O., Fantino, B., Allali, G., Muir, S. W., Montero-Odasso, M., & Annweiler, C. (2011) · The Journal of nutrition, health and aging · doi:10.1007/s12603-011-0062-0 · Cited by 503
Metadata
- Authors
- Shumway-Cook, A., Baldwin, M., Polissar, N. L., & Gruber, W.
- Venue
- Physical Therapy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-08-01
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 812-819
- ISSN
- 0031-9023 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-6724
- OpenAlex
- W2109476107
- Cited by
- 1,590
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting the Probability for Falls in Community-Dwelling Older Adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ptj/77.8.812
- The paper
- Shumway-Cook, A., Baldwin, M., Polissar, N. L., & Gruber, W. (1997). Predicting the Probability for Falls in Community-Dwelling Older Adults. Physical Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/77.8.812
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.