Reliability of Clinical Pressure-Pain Algometric Measurements Obtained on Consecutive Days
Abstract
Background and purpose Algometers have been used to measure muscle and other soft tissue tenderness. The purpose of this study was to investigate (1) "normal" pressure-pain threshold (PPT) in the biceps brachii muscle, (2) the reliability of repeated measurements of PPT in subjects without pain over 3 consecutive days, (3) the reliability of measurements of PPT between examiners, and (4) the number of measurements required to obtain a best estimate of PPT. Subjects Thirty-five subjects participated in the study. Methods Pain-pressure threshold of the biceps brachii muscle was measured using a Fischer algometer. Three test trials were done on each subject on each of 3 days by each of two examiners. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and graphical methods were used to analyze the results. Results The ICCs revealed almost perfect reliability for measurements of PPT within and across 3 days and substantial reliability between examiners. The best estimate of PPT was obtained using the mean of the second and third trials each day. Graphical methods demonstrated that agreement between examiners was greatest at low mean pain thresholds. There was no effect for order of examiner. Conclusion and discussion The PPT is a reliable measure, and repeated algometry does not change pain threshold in healthy muscle over 3 consecutive days. The PPT can be used to evaluate the development and decline of experimentally induced muscle tenderness. Reliability is enhanced when all measuremen…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Measurements of PPT have been shown to have good or excellent interrater and intrarater reliability.
“Measurements of PPT have been shown to have good or excellent interrater and intrarater reliability.36 -38”
From Effectiveness of Manual Therapy and Therapeutic Exercise for Temporomandibular Disorders: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2016) · cites this paper as [36]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Armijo-Olivo, S., Pitance, L., Singh, V., Neto, F., Thie, N., & Michelotti, A. (2016) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.2522/ptj.20140548 · Cited by 413 · see citing works
Clifford, T., Bell, O., West, D. J., Howatson, G., & Stevenson, E. J. (2016) · European Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00421-015-3290-x · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Blikstad, A., & Gemmell, H. (2008) · Clinical Chiropractic · doi:10.1016/j.clch.2007.11.002 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Torres, J. R., Martos, I. C., Sánchez, I. T., Rubio, A. O., Pelegrina, A. D., & Valenza, M. C. (2015) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2015.06.008 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Electromyogram biofeedback in patients with fibromyalgia: a randomized controlled trial
Baumueller, E., Winkelmann, A., Irnich, D., & Weigl, M. (2017) · Complementary Medicine Research · doi:10.1159/000454692 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nussbaum, E. L., & Downes, L.
- Affiliations
- Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
- St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
- Venue
- Physical Therapy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-02-01
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 160-169
- ISSN
- 0031-9023 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-6724
- OpenAlex
- W2117749278
- Cited by
- 416
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 1.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Physical Therapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Keywords
- pressure pain threshold, algometry, biceps brachii, muscle tenderness, inter-examiner reliability, test-retest reliability, measurement agreement, number of measurements
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Analysis of Variance, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Pressure, Reproducibility of Results, Pain Threshold, Muscle, Skeletal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review