The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Abdominal Muscle Response During Curl-ups on Both Stable and Labile Surfaces
Abstract
Background and Purpose. With the current interest in stability training for the injured low back, the use of labile (movable) surfaces, underneath the subject, to challenge the motor control system is becoming more popular. Little is known about the modulating effects of these surfaces on muscle activity. The purpose of this study was to establish the degree of modulating influence of the type of surface (whether stable or labile) on the mechanics of the abdominal wall. In this study, the amplitude of muscle activity together with the way that the muscles coactivated due to the type of surface under the subject were of interest. Subjects. Eight men (mean age=23.3 years [SD=4.3], mean height=177.6 cm [SD=3.4], mean weight=72.6 kg [SD=8.7]) volunteered to participate in the study. All subjects were in good health and reported no incidence of acute or chronic low back injury or prolonged back pain prior to this experiment. Methods. All subjects were requested to perform 4 different curl-up exercises—1 on a stable surface and the other 3 on varying labile surfaces. Electromyographic signals were recorded from 4 different abdominal sites on the right and left sides of the body and normalized to maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) amplitudes. Results. Performing curl-up exercises on labile surfaces increased abdominal muscle activity (eg, for curl-up on a stable surface, rectus abdominis muscle activity was 21% of MVC and external oblique muscle activity was 5% of MVC; for curl-up with the upper torso on a labile ball, rectus abdominis muscle activity was 35% of MVC and external oblique muscle activity was 10% of MVC). Furthermore, it appears that increases in external oblique muscle activity were larger than those of other abdominal muscles. Conclusion and Discussion. Performing curl-ups on labile surfaces changes both the level of muscle activity and the way that the muscles coactivate to stabilize the spine and the whole body. This finding suggests a much higher demand on the motor control system, which may be desirable for specific stages in a rehabilitation program.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The mechanisms of muscle hypertrophy and their application to resistance training
Schoenfeld, B. J. (2010) · Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research · doi:10.1519/jsc.0b013e3181e840f3 · Cited by 1,214
MVC techniques to normalize trunk muscle EMG in healthy women
Vera-Garcia, F. J., Moreside, J. M., & McGill, S. M. (2010) · Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology · doi:10.1016/j.jelekin.2009.03.010 · Cited by 314
Self-citationMaintenance of EMG Activity and Loss of Force Output With Instability
Anderson, K. G., & Behm, D. G. (2004) · Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research · doi:10.1519/00124278-200408000-00043 · Cited by 272
Metadata
- Authors
- Vera-Garcia, F. J., Grenier, S. G., & McGill, S. M.
- Venue
- Physical Therapy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-06-01
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 564-569
- ISSN
- 0031-9023 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-6724
- OpenAlex
- W2164631174
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Abdominal Muscle Response During Curl-ups on Both Stable and Labile Surfaces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ptj/80.6.564
- The paper
- Vera-Garcia, F. J., Grenier, S. G., & McGill, S. M. (2000). Abdominal Muscle Response During Curl-ups on Both Stable and Labile Surfaces. Physical Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/80.6.564
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.