Cited by 1,056Agricultural risk and resilienceAgricultural Innovations and PracticesMicrofinance and Financial Inclusion

Agricultural Decisions after Relaxing Credit and Risk Constraints *

Open access
Karlan, Dean, Osei, Robert, Osei-Akoto, Isaac, Udry, Christopher·2014·The Quarterly Journal of Economics

Abstract

The investment decisions of small-scale farmers in developing countries are conditioned by their financial environment. Binding credit market constraints and incomplete insurance can limit investment in activities with high expected profits. We conducted several experiments in northern Ghana in which farmers were randomly assigned to receive cash grants, grants of or opportunities to purchase rainfall index insurance, or a combination of the two. Demand for index insurance is strong, and insurance leads to significantly larger agricultural investment and riskier production choices in agriculture. The binding constraint to farmer investment is uninsured risk: when provided with insurance against the primary catastrophic risk they face, farmers are able to find resources to increase expenditure on their farms. Demand for insurance in subsequent years is strongly increasing with the farmer’s own receipt of insurance payouts, with the receipt of payouts by others in the farmer’s social network and with recent poor rain in the village. Both investment patterns and the demand for index insurance are consistent with the presence of important basis risk associated with the index insurance, imperfect trust that promised payouts will be delivered and overweighting recent events.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/qje/qju002

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karlan, D., Osei, R., Osei-Akoto, I., & Udry, C.
Affiliations
University of Ghana (GH)
Venue
The Quarterly Journal of Economics
Published
2014-02-11
Volume
129
Issue
2
Pages
597-652
ISSN
  • 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4650
OpenAlex
W2165369389
Cited by
1,056
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 118 · 2025: 93 · 2024: 95 · 2023: 90 · 2022: 97 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 108 · 2019: 103 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
86.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Quarterly Journal of Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion)
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural risk and resilience
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
Keywords
rainfall index insurance, agricultural investment, credit constraints, smallholder farmers, cash grants, insurance demand, basis risk, social networks, financial constraints, Ghana

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review