Agricultural Decisions after Relaxing Credit and Risk Constraints *
Open accessAbstract
The investment decisions of small-scale farmers in developing countries are conditioned by their financial environment. Binding credit market constraints and incomplete insurance can limit investment in activities with high expected profits. We conducted several experiments in northern Ghana in which farmers were randomly assigned to receive cash grants, grants of or opportunities to purchase rainfall index insurance, or a combination of the two. Demand for index insurance is strong, and insurance leads to significantly larger agricultural investment and riskier production choices in agriculture. The binding constraint to farmer investment is uninsured risk: when provided with insurance against the primary catastrophic risk they face, farmers are able to find resources to increase expenditure on their farms. Demand for insurance in subsequent years is strongly increasing with the farmer’s own receipt of insurance payouts, with the receipt of payouts by others in the farmer’s social network and with recent poor rain in the village. Both investment patterns and the demand for index insurance are consistent with the presence of important basis risk associated with the index insurance, imperfect trust that promised payouts will be delivered and overweighting recent events.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Technological Innovations, Downside Risk, and the Modernization of Agriculture
Emerick, K., de Janvry, A., Sadoulet, E., & Dar, M. H. (2016) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20150474 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
Social Learning and Incentives for Experimentation and Communication
BenYishay, A., & Mobarak, A. M. (2019) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1093/restud/rdy039 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
- Authors
- Karlan, D., Osei, R., Osei-Akoto, I., & Udry, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Ghana (GH)
- Venue
- The Quarterly Journal of Economics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-02-11
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 597-652
- ISSN
- 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-4650
- OpenAlex
- W2165369389
- Cited by
- 1,056
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 118 · 2025: 93 · 2024: 95 · 2023: 90 · 2022: 97 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 108 · 2019: 103 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 86.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Quarterly Journal of Economics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion)
- AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural risk and resilience
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
- Keywords
- rainfall index insurance, agricultural investment, credit constraints, smallholder farmers, cash grants, insurance demand, basis risk, social networks, financial constraints, Ghana
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review