Cited by 12,458Market Dynamics and VolatilityCOVID-19 Pandemic ImpactsMonetary Policy and Economic Impact

Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty*

Baker, Scott R., Bloom, Nicholas, Davis, Steven J.·2016·The Quarterly Journal of Economics

Abstract

We develop a new index of economic policy uncertainty (EPU) based on newspaper coverage frequency. Several types of evidence—including human readings of 12,000 newspaper articles—indicate that our index proxies for movements in policy-related economic uncertainty. Our U.S. index spikes near tight presidential elections, Gulf Wars I and II, the 9/11 attacks, the failure of Lehman Brothers, the 2011 debt ceiling dispute, and other major battles over fiscal policy. Using firm-level data, we find that policy uncertainty is associated with greater stock price volatility and reduced investment and employment in policy-sensitive sectors like defense, health care, finance, and infrastructure construction. At the macro level, innovations in policy uncertainty foreshadow declines in investment, output, and employment in the United States and, in a panel vector autoregressive setting, for 12 major economies. Extending our U.S. index back to 1900, EPU rose dramatically in the 1930s (from late 1931) and has drifted upward since the 1960s.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/qje/qjw024

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • NR_G's predictability is stronger during periods of high economic policy uncertainty.

    “This hypothesis finds support in our regression analysis of future returns against interaction terms between 𝑁𝑅 𝐺 and dummy variables based on economic policy uncertainty (EPU) proposed by Baker, Bloom, and Davis (2016).”

    From ChatGPT and Deepseek: Can They Predict the Stock Market and Macroeconomy? (2025) · cites this paper as Baker, Bloom, and Davis (2016)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. J.
Affiliations
John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation (US)
Venue
The Quarterly Journal of Economics
Published
2016-07-11
Volume
131
Issue
4
Pages
1593-1636
ISSN
  • 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4650
OpenAlex
W3126081245
Cited by
12,458
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2056 · 2025: 2009 · 2024: 1724 · 2023: 1639 · 2022: 1296 · 2021: 1184 · 2020: 901 · 2019: 662 · 2018: 470 · 2017: 306 · 2016: 106 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 11
FWCI
903.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Quarterly Journal of Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/M010341/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Market Dynamics and Volatility
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
Keywords
economic policy uncertainty, media coverage, uncertainty index, stock price volatility, investment, employment, fiscal policy, presidential elections, 1930s Great Depression, business cycle forecasting, panel vector autoregression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review