Distributional National Accounts: Methods and Estimates for the United States*
Open accessAbstract
This article combines tax, survey, and national accounts data to estimate the distribution of national income in the United States since 1913. Our distributional national accounts capture 100% of national income, allowing us to compute growth rates for each quantile of the income distribution consistent with macroeconomic growth. We estimate the distribution of both pretax and posttax income, making it possible to provide a comprehensive view of how government redistribution affects inequality. Average pretax real national income per adult has increased 60% from 1980 to 2014, but we find that it has stagnated for the bottom 50% of the distribution at about $16,000 a year. The pretax income of the middle class—adults between the median and the 90th percentile—has grown 40% since 1980, faster than what tax and survey data suggest, due in particular to the rise of tax-exempt fringe benefits. Income has boomed at the top. The upsurge of top incomes was first a labor income phenomenon but has mostly been a capital income phenomenon since 2000. The government has offset only a small fraction of the increase in inequality. The reduction of the gender gap in earnings has mitigated the increase in inequality among adults, but the share of women falls steeply as one moves up the labor income distribution, and is only 11% in the top 0.1% in 2014.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Optimal Taxation of Top Labor Incomes: A Tale of Three Elasticities
Piketty, T., Saez, E., & Stantcheva, S. (2014) · American Economic Journal: Economic Policy · doi:10.1257/pol.6.1.230 · Cited by 713 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mobility Report Cards: The Role of Colleges in Intergenerational Mobility
Chetty, R., Friedman, J., Saez, E., Turner, N., & Yagan, D. (2017) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w23618 · Cited by 632 · see citing works
Self-citationUneven growth: automation’s impact on income and wealth inequality
Moll, B., Rachel, L., & Restrepo, P. (2022) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta19417 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Brown, C. (2023) · Yin-Cheng Journal of Contemporary Buddhism · doi:10.15239/ycjcb.01.01.07 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Piketty, T., Saez, E., & Zucman, G.
- Affiliations
- Paris School of Economics (FR)
- National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
- ORCID
- Piketty, Thomas
- Venue
- The Quarterly Journal of Economics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2017-10-10
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 553-609
- ISSN
- 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-4650
- OpenAlex
- W2562670863
- Cited by
- 1,141
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 100 · 2025: 169 · 2024: 93 · 2023: 150 · 2022: 154 · 2021: 139 · 2020: 164 · 2019: 93 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 230.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- shs.hal.science
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- The Quarterly Journal of Economics (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economic Theory and Policy
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Fiscal Studies
- Keywords
- distributional national accounts, income distribution, household income, income shares, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review