Cited by 891Climate Change Policy and EconomicsSustainable Development and Environmental ManagementEnergy, Environment, Economic Growth

Instrument Choice in Environmental Policy

Open access
Goulder, Lawrence H., Parry, Ian W. H.·2008·Review of Environmental Economics and Policy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/reep/ren005

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Exemptions, free allocation, and compensation enhance the political feasibility of carbon pricing because they avoid confronting highly mobilized producer groups who highlight the risk of carbon leakage as well as economic losses.

    “These approaches enhance the political feasibility of carbon pricing because they avoid confronting highly mobilized producer groups who highlight the risk of carbon leakage as well as economic losses (81).”

    From Carbon Leakage, Consumption, and Trade (2022) · cites this paper as [81]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goulder, L. H., & Parry, I. W. H.
Affiliations
Resources For The Future (US)
Venue
Review of Environmental Economics and Policy
Published
2008-07-01
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
152-174
ISSN
  • 1750-6816 (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-6824
OpenAlex
W3125477968
Cited by
891
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 85 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 38
FWCI
64.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Review of Environmental Economics and Policy (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Keywords
environmental policy instruments, pollution control, pollution taxes, performance standards, research grants, environmental technology, pollution externalities, market failure, cost-effectiveness, distributional equity, uncertainty, political feasibility, hybrid instruments, policy interaction, regulatory jurisdiction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review