The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Effectiveness of Environmental Monitoring and Enforcement: A Review of the Empirical Evidence
Abstract
Regulatory punishment for pollution violations is a mainstay of nearly every industrialized nation's environmental policy. This article reviews the existing empirical evidence on the impacts of environmental monitoring and enforcement actions. We first provide context by investigating the U.S. regulatory setting. We then briefly discuss how economists think about environmental enforcement. We next consider recent empirical evidence linking regulator actions to subsequent pollution discharges and compliance behavior. Since the literature primarily studies U.S. institutions, our review focuses mainly on the effects of Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. state activities. The consistent findings from this literature review are as follows: (1) environmental monitoring and enforcement activities generate substantial specific deterrence, reducing future violations at the targeted firm; (2) environmental monitoring and enforcement activities generate substantial general deterrence, reducing future violations at facilities other than the targeted one; and (3) environmental monitoring and enforcement activities generate not only reductions in violations but also significant reductions in emissions. We conclude by discussing policy implications and identifying gaps in the current state of knowledge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The consequences of spatially differentiated water pollution regulation in China
Chen, Z., Kahn, M. E., Liu, Y., & Wang, Z. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2018.01.010 · Cited by 1,155
Greenwash vs. Brownwash: Exaggeration and Undue Modesty in Corporate Sustainability Disclosure
Kim, E.-H., & Lyon, T. P. (2015) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2014.0949 · Cited by 932
Remote sensing for lake research and monitoring – Recent advances
Dörnhöfer, K., & Oppelt, N. (2016) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.12.009 · Cited by 473
Colwell, S. R., & Joshi, A. W. (2013) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.732 · Cited by 370
Johnson, M. S. (2020) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20180501 · Cited by 246
Metadata
- Authors
- Gray, W. B., & Shimshack, J. P.
- Venue
- Review of Environmental Economics and Policy
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2011-01-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-24
- ISSN
- 1750-6816 (ISSN-L)
- 1750-6824
- OpenAlex
- W2077548741
- Cited by
- 519
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 76.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effectiveness of Environmental Monitoring and Enforcement: A Review of the Empirical Evidence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/reep/req017
- The paper
- Gray, W. B., & Shimshack, J. P. (2011). The Effectiveness of Environmental Monitoring and Enforcement: A Review of the Empirical Evidence. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/req017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.